Did your soybean yield also suffer from SCN this year?
When you harvested soybeans this fall, did your yield monitor make some wide swings as you moved through the field? Part of the problem was due to the drought and soil type, but part of the problem may have resulted from soybean cyst nematode (SCN) in your field. Although you could not do much to control what yield loss was due to the drought, SCN’s role in your lower revenue may have been preventable to a significant degree. Plan this winter to recapture those lost dollars.
SCN has been robbing yields for most soybean producers around the Cornbelt, and there is no better time than the present to reverse that trend, say Ohio State University plant pathologists Anne Dorrance and Terry Niblack. The specialist say high populations of SCN can create huge yield losses, particularly when soybean varieties are planted that are susceptible to their attack on roots.
Unfortunately, since SCN operates below the soil the problem usually is not detectable until harvest time the soybeans do not fill your grain tank as fast as you would have expected. They will be in pockets in the field, especially in no-till fields say Dorrance and Niblack. They report that within a 25-foot span the level of eggs per cup of soil can range from zero to 2,000, and at that point yield losses are measurable. They advise producers to look at the low yield spots in a soybean field and target those areas to sample the soil and begin monitoring the potential problem you have on your entire operation to ensure it does not get out of control and soybean profitability plunges.
SCN resistance within soybean varieties comes from a variety known as PI 88788, but since that has been the dominant source of resistance and has been used for many years, its resistance is wearing down, just like waterhemp and marestail are becoming resistant to glyphosate. Dorrance and Niblack report that some populations of SCN in Ohio are feeding on the roots of soybean plants with the PI 88788 genetics. That means even users of soybean varieties that are supposedly resistant the SCN should begin to monitor SCN populations in their fields.
Nasty, unexpected surprise
The SCN specialists say they have found some fields where SCN populations are more than 10,000 per cup of soil, and producers took their advice to not plant soybeans in those fields for several years in an effort to starve the SCN down to more manageable levels. However, after 3 years of no soybeans, the first crop was still severely damaged by SCN even though the field was planted with a variety that was considered to be resistant. After harvest, soil samples were taken again and SCN populations were still considered too high. Even though the field was in Ohio, similar cases have been reported in Missouri and Iowa where that research was also done. The outcome of the research points to the need to keep populations low, since high populations cannot be reduced.
No matching related articles at this time.
- Monsanto launches Mexico center for developing GMO corn
- Verdesian Life Sciences acquires QC Corporation
- Economist: Taxing P could reduce risk of algal blooms
- Study suggests more waters may deserve federal protection
- Fertilizer maker Mosaic cuts phosphate output
- Ag markets moved mostly lower Tuesday night
- Activists fighting Golden Rice even more in 2014
- U.S. GMO labeling foes triple spending in first half of this year
- Source shows half of GMO research is independent
- White House issues veto threat on bill to block WOTUS rule
- How much corn can the ethanol industry use?
- East-West Seed signs marketing collaboration with Monsanto