Unpredictable soybean response to starter fertilizer
click image to zoom Starter fertilizers (2x2 and in-furrow) have produced mixed results in SMaRT (Soybean Management and Research Technology) on-farm trials. In-furrow fertilizer increased soybean yields in two of 11 trials and decreased yields at one location. Starter fertilizer placed in a 2x2 band increased soybean yields in one of three trials and decreased yields at one of the sites. This article will focus on the three trials that showed a yield increase from starter fertilizer to identify any commonalities that might help predict when starter fertilizer will increase soybean yields.
click image to zoom The information presented in Table 2 shows the analysis, application rate and application method for the fertilizers applied at the three responsive sites. This information shows that yield increases can be obtained from both fluid and dry fertilizers and in-furrow and 2x2 placement methods. Soybeans are more sensitive to salt injury than corn so in-furrow fertilizer use on soybeans requires extra caution. Michigan State University Extension recommends the 2x2 placement method as it provides a greater level of crop safety.
click image to zoom The potential for a positive yield response from starter fertilizer is predicted to increase when phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) soil test levels are below the critical levels for these nutrients and when planting into cool, wet soils. The soil test P and K levels for each of the responsive sites are listed in Table 3. All P and K soil test levels were above the critical levels except the Allegan location where the K level was below the critical level of 97 ppm. So, existing P and K soil test levels were not good predictors of the starter fertilizer yield response at these sites.
Three factors generally lead to lower soil temperatures: 1) early planting dates; 2) no-tillage or high residue cover; and 3) fine-textured soils. This information is provided in Table 3. None of the fields were planted early, two of the fields were tilled and had low residue cover and none of the sites had fine-textured soils. Again, there were no consistent factors that could be identified to explain the positive yield response from starter fertilizer at these sites.
Unfortunately, there doesn’t appear to be any common factors that can be identified from these locations for predicting when starter fertilizer will increase soybean yields. However, these sites do not disprove or refute the general consensus that a positive response to starter fertilizer is more likely when P and K soil test levels are below the critical levels and when planting into cool, wet soil conditions.
This article was produced by the SMaRT project (Soybean Management and Research Technology). The SMaRT project was developed to help Michigan producers increase soybean yields and farm profitability. The SMaRT project is a partnership between MSU Extension and the Michigan Soybean Checkoff program.
- Deere to lay off more than 600 at four U.S. plants
- Slow pace of rail recovery stirs fear of future woes
- The four pillars of seeing opportunities in problems
- WinField introduces Answer Tech and Data Silo
- New DuPont Afforia herbicide introduced for soybeans
- Ohio’s largest Deere dealer to sell precision drone products
- No El Niño in 2014? Drought-weary California in trouble
- Suspected Bt corn rootworm resistance in Pennsylvania
- BioNitrogen to build second fertilizer plant in Texas
- Commentary: Setting the record straight on 'Waters of the U.S.'
- Soybean aphid numbers on the rise
- Solar energy jobs increase, wind power decrease