Soil calcium and magnesium levels

decrease font size  Resize text   increase font size       Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Is it important to have the proper ratio of calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) in the soil? Many producers ask this question when they have their soil tested for nutrient levels. This question also arises at the moment of lime purchase, which can be an important source of Ca and Mg.

Calcium and magnesium are plant-essential nutrients. All soils contain Ca and Mg in the form of cations (positively charged ions, Ca++ and Mg++) that attach to the soil clay and organic matter; these are also the forms taken up by crops. The relative proportion of these elements, as well as the total amount in the soil, depends mainly on the soil parent material. In Kansas soils, the levels of Ca and Mg are typically high and crop deficiencies are rare.

Soils typically have higher Ca levels than Mg. Table 1 gives the amount and ratios of Ca and Mg for some soils in Kansas. Both nutrients are present in large quantities. Unusual cases of Ca or Mg deficiencies may be found in areas of very sandy soils. 

Table 1. Calcium, magnesium, and Ca:Mg ratio for several Kansas soils.




Ca:Mg ratio


- - cmol kg-1 - - -






















































Why would the ratio of Ca to Mg be important? The concept of an optimum Ca:Mg ratio started in the 1940s under the “basic cation saturation ratio” theory. The theory is that an “ideal soil” will have a balanced ratio of Ca, Mg, and K. According to this theory, fertilization should be based on the soil’s needs rather than crop’s needs. This concept of an ideal Ca:Mg ratio has been debated by agronomist over the years. The suggested ideal ratio according to the theory is between 3.5 and 6.0, but this has never proven to be of significance.

There is very little research evidence to support any effect, either positive or negative, of the soil Ca:Mg ratio on crop production and yield. Several research studies conducted in the laboratory and in the field show no effect of Ca:Mg ratio on crop yield. Despite this, the promotion of the ratio concept persists today. Furthermore, the initial work that derived this concept did not differentiate between crop response (alfalfa) due to the change in Ca:Mg ratio and the improvement in soil pH from lime application. It is reasonable to conclude that crop response can be expected from changes in soil pH rather than any change in the ratio of Ca:Mg.

One example of research conducted on this topic over the years is shown in Table 2. In that experiment, McLean and coworkers demonstrated the lack of relationship between Ca:Mg ratio and crop yield for several crops. The range of Ca:Mg ratios observed for the highest yields were not different from those observed for the lowest yields. The conclusion from that study was that to achieve maximum crop yield, attention should center on providing sufficient levels of these nutrients rather than attempting to find an adequate ratio.

Table 2. Ratio of Ca:Mg for five crop-years comparing the highest and lower yields obtained








Yield level

   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ca:Mg ratio - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Highest five

5.7 - 26.8

5.7 - 14.2

5.7 - 14.9

5.7 - 14.0

5.7 - 26.8

6.8 - 26.8

Lowest five

5.8 - 21.5

5.0 - 16.1

2.3 - 16.1

6.8 - 21.5

8.2 - 21.5

5.7 - 21.5

Adapted from: McLean, E.O., R.C. Hartwig, D.J. Eckert, and G.B. Triplett. 1983. Basic cation saturation ratios as a basis for fertilizing and liming agronomic crops. II. Field studies. Agronomy Journal 75: 635-639.


There is no reason to use the Ca:Mg ratio concept for a nutrient application or liming program. The center of attention should be the level of Ca and Mg in the soil rather than trying to manage the ratio. The relative concentration of Ca and Mg in commercial ag lime can be highly variable, and application should be based on the effective calcium carbonate (ECC) to achieve a target soil pH.

Buyers Guide

Doyle Equipment Manufacturing Co.
Doyle Equipment Manufacturing prides themselves as being “The King of the Rotary’s” with their Direct Drive Rotary Blend Systems. With numerous setup possibilities and sizes, ranging from a  more...
A.J. Sackett Sons & Company
Sackett Blend Towers feature the H.I.M, High Intensity Mixer, the next generation of blending and coating technology which supports Precision Fertilizer Blending®. Its unique design allows  more...
R&R Manufacturing Inc.
The R&R Minuteman Blend System is the original proven performer. Fast, precise blending with a compact foot print. Significantly lower horsepower requirement. Low inload height with large  more...
Junge Control Inc.
Junge Control Inc. creates state-of-the-art product blending and measuring solutions that allow you to totally maximize operating efficiency with amazing accuracy and repeatability, superior  more...
Yargus Manufacturing
The flagship blending system for the Layco product line is the fully automated Layco DW System™. The advanced technology of the Layco DW (Declining Weight) system results in a blending  more...
Yargus Manufacturing
The LAYCOTE™ Automated Coating System provides a new level of coating accuracy for a stand-alone coating system or for coating (impregnating) in an automated blending system. The unique  more...
John Deere
The DN345 Drawn Dry Spreader can carry more than 12 tons of fertilizer and 17.5 tons of lime. Designed to operate at field speeds up to 20 MPH with full loads and the G4 spreader uniformly  more...
Force Unlimited
The Pro-Force is a multi-purpose spreader with a wider apron and steeper sides. Our Pro-Force has the most aggressive 30” spinner on the market, and is capable of spreading higher rates of  more...
BBI Spreaders
MagnaSpread 2 & MagnaSpread 3 — With BBI’s patented multi-bin technology, these spreaders operate multiple hoppers guided by independent, variable-rate technology. These models are built on  more...

Related Articles

No matching related articles at this time.

Comments (1) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Marvin Miller    
Nampa, Idaho  |  May, 19, 2013 at 04:39 AM

Magnesium and calcium ratios are important. HIgh magnesium in soil causes a crusting and sealing on top of the soil. It cuts off air to the plant roots and soil microbes responsible for nutrient availability. High magnesium also can be associated with higher sodium levels. Magnesium holds moisture 4 times longer than calcium. Magnesium is associated with clay particles. High CEC is always the result of some higher magnesium levels. When calcium is high in soil in the base saturation percent you can have high lime levels. This leads to cementation of soil and can cause a hard crust about 2 inches thick on top of the soil. Calcium soils hold less water and disperse it. Calcium soils hold water about 1/4 as long as high magnesium soils. High calcium blocks uptake of magnesium in the plant. High magnesium blocks uptake of calcium. My theory of soils is called the "Dominant Cat" theory. The dominant cation is the one you have to work against to achieve good crop and soil balance. The Dominant Cation always has a laundry list of things that it causes in soil. The major cations in my theory are potassium, magnesium, calcium, hydrogen and sodium. Good balances in soil are rare. Soil is usually always out of balance and only foliar feeding can correct the imbalances in crops caused by soil imbalances. It is not economically feasible to add enough gypsum to correct the low calcium or lime to correct low pH. It is not economically feasible to add enough sulfur to lower the effects of high calcium and lime in the soil. Balance of all cations in the soil is important but rarely within reach to obtain. Marvin Miller, President, Integrated Biological Systems, Inc. Nampa, Idaho

Smooth Wall Grain Bins

Meridian’s SmoothWall bins are the ultimate storage bins, used to handle and store fertilizer, grain, feed and seed, and extend ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Feedback Form