Starter fertilizer rates and placement for corn
resize text
Polyphosphates were not developed by the fluid fertilizer industry because of agronomic performance issues. Instead, polyphosphates were developed to improve the storage characteristics of fluid phosphate products (and other fertilizers made from them) and to increase the analysis of liquid phosphate fertilizers. Ammonium polyphosphate is equal in agronomic performance to ammonium orthophosphates when applied at the same P2O5 rates in a similar manner. And liquid phosphate products are equal in agronomic performance to dry phosphate products if applied at equal P2O5 rates in a similar manner.
The University of Nebraska evaluated the effect of phosphorus application from orthophosphate or polyphosphate applied at identical P2O5 rates on corn yield (Table 1). There was no yield difference between phosphorus sources. The simple reason for this is that when polyphosphate is added to soil, a process called hydrolysis breaks down the polyphosphate chains into orthophosphates. The concern of many people is the length of time it takes for this process to occur. Previous studies indicate that although it may take a few days to complete the hydrolysis process, the majority is completed in 48 hours. As a result, phosphorus in soil solution will typically be similar from either source shortly after application.
|
Table 1. Corn Yield Response in Nebraska to Different Sources of P Fertilizer |
||
|
|
Phosphorus Source |
|
|
P2O5 Rate (lb/ac) |
Polyphosphate |
Orthophosphate |
|
|
-----------------------Corn bu/ac----------------------- |
|
|
15 |
124 |
124 |
|
30 |
134 |
134 |
|
45 |
142 |
142 |
No-till corn will almost always respond to a starter fertilizer that includes N – along with other needed nutrients – regardless of soil fertility levels or yield environment. This is especially so when preplant N is applied as deep-banded anhydrous ammonia or UAN, or where most of the N is sidedressed in-season. That’s because no-till soils are almost always colder and wetter at corn planting time than soils that have been tilled, and N mineralization from organic matter tends to be slower at the start of the season in no-till environments.
In general, no-till corn is less likely to respond to an N starter if more than 50 pounds of N was broadcast prior to or shortly after planting.
In reduced-till systems, the situation becomes less clear. The planting/germination zone in strip-till or ridge-till corn is typically not as cold and wet as no-till, despite the high levels of crop residue in the row middles. Still, N and P starter fertilizer is often beneficial for corn planted in reduced-till conditions, especially where soil test levels are very low, or low, and where the yield environment is high. As with no-till, reduced-till corn is also less likely to respond to an N starter if more than 50 pounds of N was broadcast prior to or shortly after planting.
Conventional- or clean-tilled corn is unlikely to give an economic response to an N and P starter unless the P soil test is low.
Starter fertilizer placement
Producers should be very cautious about applying starter fertilizer that includes N and/or K, or some micronutrients such as boron, in direct seed contact. It is best to have some soil separation between the starter fertilizer and the seed. The safest placement methods for starter fertilizer are either:
-- A subsurface-band application 2 to 3 inches to the side and 2 to 3 inches below the seed, or
-- A surface-band application 2 to 3 inches to the side of the seed row at planting time, especially in conventional tillage or where farmers are using row cleaners or trash movers in no-till.
If producers apply starter fertilizer with the corn seed, they run an increased risk of seed injury when applying more than 6 to 8 pounds per acre of N and K combined in direct seed contact on a 30-inch row spacing. Nitrogen and K fertilizer can result in salt injury at high application rates if seed is in contact with the fertilizer. Furthermore, if the N source is urea or UAN, in-furrow application is not recommended regardless of fertilizer rate. Urea converts to ammonia, which is very toxic to seedlings and can significantly reduce final stands.
Work several years ago at the North Central Kansas Irrigation Experiment Field near Scandia illustrates some of these points (Table 2). In this research, former Agronomist-In-Charge Barney Gordon compared in-furrow, 2x2, and surface band placement of different starter fertilizer rates in a multi-year study on irrigated corn. Excellent responses from up to 30 pounds of N combined with 15 pounds of P were obtained with the both the 2x2 and surface-band placement. In-furrow placement however, was not nearly as effective. This was due to stand reduction from salt injury to the germinating seedlings, likely due to the high application rate of N plus K in furrow, indicating the importance of monitoring the N+K rates for in furrow application. Where no starter, or the 2x2 and surface band placement, was used, final stands were approximately 30-31,000 plants per acre. However, with the 5-15-5 in furrow treatment, the final stand was approximately 25,000. The final stand was just over 20,000 with the in-furrow 60-15-5 treatment.
|
Table 2. Effect of Starter Fertilizer Placement on Corn Yield at North Central Irrigation Experiment Field |
|||
|
Yield (bu/acre) |
|||
|
Fertilizer Applied (lbs) |
In-Furrow Placement |
2x2 Band Placement |
Surface Band Placement |
|
Check: 159 bu |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
5-15-5 |
172 |
194 |
190 |
|
15-15-5 |
177 |
197 |
198 |
|
30-15-5 |
174 |
216 |
212 |
|
45-15-5 |
171 |
215 |
213 |
|
60-15-15 |
163 |
214 |
213 |
|
Average |
171 |
207 |
205 |








Comments (0) Leave a comment