Drought may result in aflatoxin-contaminated corn
Corn harvest for most farmers in the upper Mississippi Delta Region including southeast Missouri will begin near August 1 to 15, and farmers need to beware of aflatoxin contaminated grain. Aflatoxin contaminated corn may develop this year because drought was severe, and damage to corn by drought can enhance the development on corn kernels of the mold that produces aflatoxin. All corn farmers even those that irrigated their crop should take some precautions to avoid problems with aflatoxin.
Here is the situation. The problem occurs when a mold named Aspergillus flavus feeds on the starch inside corn kernels and produces a chemical called aflatoxin that is a poison to many animals and to humans. This mold gets to the starch through cracks in the kernel hull caused by drought and through wounds caused by ear worm feeding. I don’t know the reason this mold produces aflatoxin as it feeds, but it does. Aflatoxin will be produced as long as the mold feeds on corn in the field, on a truck after harvest, or in a grain storage tank, and it will not stop until the corn is at or below 13% moisture.
Aflatoxin is a poison to humans and animals, and the U. S. Food and Drug Administration designed methods to protect humans and animals from contaminated corn and corn products. One of the methods designed by FDA to protect us is to prevent grain merchants from buying corn containing 20 parts per billion or more aflatoxin. This is good because it minimizes availability of aflatoxin contaminated products that we eat such as corn meal.
This mold can grow on corn kernels in the field and on corn kernels stored in a truck or grain tank. The mold prefers to grow on 18-20% moisture corn kernels at around 85? F. It grows slowly on 15% moisture corn and will not grow or grows very slowly on 13% moisture corn. Farmers should dry freshly harvested corn to 15% moisture within 24 hours of harvest and dry corn to 13% for long term storage to stop growth of the mold and aflatoxin production.
What should farmers do this year? I suggest they first harvest some dryland corn and have the grain tested for aflatoxin. If it is not contaminated, then the irrigated corn will probably not be contaminated. If the dryland corn is contaminated, farmers should then harvest some irrigated corn and test it for aflatoxin. If the irrigated corn has no aflatoxin, farmers should first harvest and sell the healthy corn or store it in separate bins and then harvest the contaminated corn and store it separate from the healthy corn. Don’t blend contaminated and toxin free corn in a truck or grain bin because this may result in contamination of the entire truck load or bin of corn.
What should farmers do to avoid aflatoxin problems next year and beyond? I suggest they only plant corn in fields that can be irrigated and treat growing corn for earworm if necessary. They may also consider planting corn varieties resistant to earworm, but the corn may still be contaminated with aflatoxin if not irrigated aggressively.
Again, corn farmers should beware of this problem and always dry corn to 15% moisture within 24 hours of harvest. More information is available on the web at http://extension.missouri.edu/publications/DisplayPub.aspx?P=G4155.
Following these suggested procedures will give corn farmers a better chance of producing aflatoxin-free corn during 2012. For more information, you may call me at 573-379-5431 or visit the web at http://aes.missouri.edu/delta/croppest/aflacorn.stm.
- Critics of Dow herbicide sue U.S. EPA over approval
- Survey shows big data use increasing
- Partnership to collaborate on bio-stimulants
- DuPont Pioneer celebrates production expansion in Ontario
- No-till may not bring hoped-for boost in global crop yields
- Crop markets moved mostly higher again Thursday night
- How much corn can the ethanol industry use?
- Economist: Taxing P could reduce risk of algal blooms
- Commentary: Government wants farmers to quit farming
- Ag markets made a generally mixed showing Thursday night
- What is the relationship between maturity group, yield?
- Commentary: Ambulance-chaser lawyers take on Syngenta