AgProfessional Magazine

AgProfessional magazine is a monthly magazine that provides editorial and advertising for agronomic and business management solutions specifically to agricultural retailers/distributors, professional farm managers and crop consultants.

View Current Issue/Archives | Subscribe to the Magazine

The latest news and information of specific interest to farm managers, crop consultants, ag retailers and the ag industry professionals serving them is delivered weekly on Monday in this e-newsletter.

View Current Issue | Subscribe Now | View Archives

News specific to inform, educate and assist ag retailers is delivered in this e-newsletter weekly each Thursday. Circulation is limited to only ag retailer/distributor management and employees.

View Current Issue | Subscribe Now | View Archives
Decision Engine Logo
  Search Term:
  Crop:

Quick Search Clear


Advertise on this site


GM seeds case may go to Supreme Court

Colleen Scherer, Managing Editor, Ag Professional  |   April 11, 2012
decrease font size resize text increase font size

The Supreme Court is being petitioned to hear a case regarding whether farmers can save and replant genetically modified seeds. Monsanto Company sued an Indiana farmer for purchasing and replanting its Roundup Ready soybeans. The courts have upheld that Monsanto’s patents for its GM seeds can be used to stop farmers from saving and replanting them.

Although the Federal Circuit Court upheld the ruling for Monsanto, Indiana farmer Vernon Bowman has petitioned the Supreme Court to hear the case. He claims his use of the seeds is covered by patent law’s “exhaustion doctrine.” This doctrine holds that a patent holder’s rights in a product are “exhausted” when the product is sold to an end user, according to Wired Science. Bowman further argues that because he was not required to sign a licensing agreement when he purchased the seeds, he was free to plant them.

This week, upon the vote of at least four Justices, the Supreme Court asked the Obama administration to weigh in on the petition, requesting that the Solicitor General, the official in charge of representing the Obama administration, file briefs expressing the views of the United States, Patently-O reported. Although the case remains to be heard—the court can still opt not to do so—a study of 30,000 petitions found that those for which the court requests a response from the Solicitor General are four times more likely to be granted.


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Feedback Form