AgProfessional Magazine

AgProfessional magazine is a monthly magazine that provides editorial and advertising for agronomic and business management solutions specifically to agricultural retailers/distributors, professional farm managers and crop consultants.

View Current Issue/Archives | Subscribe to the Magazine

The latest news and information of specific interest to farm managers, crop consultants, ag retailers and the ag industry professionals serving them is delivered weekly on Monday in this e-newsletter.

View Current Issue | Subscribe Now | View Archives

News specific to inform, educate and assist ag retailers is delivered in this e-newsletter weekly each Thursday. Circulation is limited to only ag retailer/distributor management and employees.

View Current Issue | Subscribe Now | View Archives
Decision Engine Logo
  Search Term:
  Crop:

Quick Search Clear


Advertise on this site


Dismissal in Potash Corp insider trading case

Jonathan Stempel, Reuters   |   January 3, 2012
decrease font size resize text increase font size

A Spanish trader won dismissal of a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit accusing him of insider trading in Potash Corp of Saskatchewan Inc. stock before the Canadian fertilizer company became the target of a $38.6-billion (U.S.) unsolicited takeover.

U.S. District Judge Marvin Aspen in Chicago said the SEC failed to show that Luis Martin Caro Sanchez, 37, had any direct link to an insider, or that his discarded laptop computer contained relevant information about his trades.

The SEC in August, 2010 had accused Sanchez and former Banco Santander SA research analyst Juan Jose Fernandez Garcia of using material nonpublic information in buying Potash call options before that company revealed that it had received and rejected a $38.6-billion takeover bid by BHP Billiton Ltd. BHP-N

Santander had advised BHP on the bid, which Potash disclosed on Aug. 17, 2010. Potash shares rose nearly 26 per cent that day. BHP, an Anglo-Australian mining company, abandoned its bid three months later.

“The SEC theorizes that Sanchez was informed of some unidentified information related to the proposed acquisition, at an unidentified time, by an unidentified insider, and traded on this unidentified information,” the judge wrote. “This chain of speculation does not raise a material issue of fact for consideration by a jury.”


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Feedback Form