There are several 2-gene Clearfield wheat varieties currently on the market in our geography, including AP503 CL2 from Syngenta/AgriPro, Brawl CL Plus from Colorado State University, and Doublestop CL Plus from Oklahoma State University.

It is important that spray applicators know whether a Clearfield wheat variety is 1-gene or 2-gene since the spray adjuvants that can be used when spraying 2-gene Clearfield varieties with Beyond herbicide can severely injure 1-gene Clearfield varieties. What exactly is the difference between 2-gene and 1-gene Clearfield varieties in terms of how they can be managed, herbicide applications, grass control, and crop injury?

There is no difference in the labeled rates of Beyond that can be applied in a single growing season to 1-gene and 2-gene Clearfield varieties. However, 2-gene Clearfield varieties have expanded application timing and adjuvant options compared to 1-gene Clearfield varieties. 

Beyond plus nonionic surfactant can be applied from the 2-leaf to the second joint stages of wheat on 2-gene varieties, but only after tiller initiation until jointing on 1-gene varieties. Beyond plus methylated seed soil can be applied to 2-gene Clearfield varieties after tiller initiation until the jointing stages of wheat, but methylated seed oil cannot be used with Beyond at any time on 1-gene varieties. In all cases, a nitrogen-based fertilizer such as AMS or 28 percent UAN should also be added to the spray solution.

The adjuvant can make a significant difference in the level of feral rye and downy brome control with Beyond, especially with spring treatments. Since cheat, Japanese brome, and jointed goatgrass are usually quite susceptible to Beyond, the adjuvant usually does not make as much difference in the level of control of these grasses. Research at K-State near Manhattan illustrates the effect.

 

Winter Annual Grass Control and Crop Response in 2-gene Clearfield Wheat

Treatment

Application rate (oz/acre)

Application timing

Wheat injury (%)

Japanese brome control (%)

Downy brome control (%)

Rye control (%)

Beyond + NIS + AMS

4

Fall

0

100

99

95

Beyond + MSO + AMS

4

Fall

0

100

99

100

Beyond + MSO + AMS

6

Fall

0

100

100

100

Beyond + MSO + AMS

12 (2x)

Fall

0

100

100

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beyond + NIS + AMS

4

Spring

0

98

75

57

Beyond + MSO + AMS

4

Spring

0

99

82

78

Beyond + MSO + AMS

6

Spring

0

100

91

93

Beyond + MSO + AMS

12 (2x)

Spring

0

100

97

100

LSD (0.05)

 

 

NS

NS

4

11

Note:  The maximum single application use rate of Beyond is 6 oz/acre. The 12 oz/acre rate would simulate spray overlaps in the field and is not a labeled broadcast application rate.

 

For spring applications of Beyond, including MSO as an adjuvant measurably improved control of downy brome and feral rye compared to using NIS as the adjuvant. But as mentioned above, Beyond with MSO can only be used on 2-gene Clearfield varieties. MSO has been more effective than COC in these situations.

Beyond is labeled for control of many winter annual grasses (including jointed goatgrass, cheat, downy brome, and Japanese brome), but only suppression of feral rye. Control of feral rye with Beyond in K-State tests has been somewhat erratic and unpredictable. The best control will likely be achieved with fall applications, using the 6 oz rate instead of the 4 oz rate, and using MSO instead of NIS where that is allowed. In general, the best control of feral rye in 1-gene Clearfield varieties has been with fall applications. With 2-gene Clearfield varieties, producers have more options for better rye control.

The other advantage of 2-gene Clearfield over 1-gene Clearfield wheat varieties is in the higher degree of crop safety from applications of Beyond. Occasionally, Beyond has caused some crop injury to 1-gene Clearfield wheat. This occurs most often where there is spray overlap (2x rates), when stress conditions prevail, or where wheat was not at the recommended treatment stages at the time of application. In K-State tests, 2-gene Clearfield wheat varieties have demonstrated much less potential for crop injury than 1-gene varieties in these situations.