Why crop rotation works
Crop rotation has been used since Roman times to improve plant nutrition and to control the spread of disease. A new study to be published in Nature’s ‘The ISME Journal’ reveals the profound effect it has on enriching soil with bacteria, fungi and protozoa.
“Changing the crop species massively changes the content of microbes in the soil, which in turn helps the plant to acquire nutrients, regulate growth and protect itself against pests and diseases, boosting yield,” said Professor Philip Poole from the John Innes Centre.
Soil was collected from a field near Norwich and planted with wheat, oats and peas. Next generation sequencing was performed at The Genome Analysis Centre to identify changes in abundance and composition of the soil communities. After growing wheat, the soil remained largely unchanged and the microbes in it were mostly bacteria. However, growing oat and peas in the same sample caused a huge shift towards protozoa and nematode worms. Soil grown with peas was highly enriched for fungi.
All organisms on our planet can be divided between prokaryotes (which include bacteria) and eukaryotes (which include humans, plants and animals as well as fungi). After only four weeks of growth, the soil surrounding wheat contained about 3% eukaryotes. This went up to 12-15% for oat and pea. The change of balance is likely to be even more marked in the field where crops are grown for months rather than weeks.
Analysis has previously relied on amplifying DNA samples. This limits scientists to analysing one taxonomic group at a time such as bacteria. It also means that everything present in that group is analysed rather than what is playing an active role. Every gram of soil contains over 50,000 species of bacteria so the task is enormous.
There are relatively fewer actively expressed genes, or RNA. It is now possible to sequence RNA across kingdoms so a full snapshot can be taken of the active bacteria, fungi, protozoa and other microbes in the soil. Sequencing was carried out in collaboration between The Genome Analysis Centre and the University of East Anglia.
“Analysis of complex environmental samples poses a significant challenge due to the variety and differential abundance of the organisms present in the community,” said David Swarbreck, Group Leader at The Genome Analysis Centre. “High throughput sequencing has enabled us to explore the rhizosphere community using an approach that is not dependent on the type of target organism or biases associated to PCR primers and with sufficient depth to examine the active community for bacteria, archaea (single celled organisms) and soil eukaryotes such as fungi and nematodes.”
“By sequencing RNA, we can look at the big picture of active microbes in the soil,” said PhD student Tom Turner from the John Innes Centre. “This also allows us to work out what they are doing there, including how they might be helping the plants out.”
“Our work helps explain the experience of farmers in the field,” said Professor Poole. “The best seed needs to be combined with the best agronomic practices to get the full potential benefits. While continued planting of one species in monoculture pulls the soil in one direction, rotating to a different one benefits soil health.”
Seeds can be inoculated with bacteria before planting out, just like humans taking a dose of friendly bacteria. But this does not achieve the diversity or quantity of microbes found in this study.
The scientists also grew an oat variety unable to produce normal levels of avenacin, a compound that protects roots from fungal pathogens. They expected the soil to contain higher levels of fungi as a result, but instead found it contained a greater diversity of other eukaryotes such as protozoa.
The findings of the study could be used to develop plant varieties that encourage beneficial microbes in the soil. John Innes Centre scientists are already investigating the possibility of engineering cereal crops able to associate with the nitrogen-fixing bacteria normally associated with peas.
“Small changes in plant genotype can have complex and unexpected effects on soil microbes surrounding the roots,” said Professor Poole. “Scientists, breeders and farmers can make the most of these effects not only with what they grow but how they grow it.”
Scientists at The Genome Analysis Centre are applying approaches similar to those used in this research to analyse large-scale metagenomics data sets with particular relevance to the role of microbial communities in human health, agriculture and biotechnology.
The research was made possible with funding from the Earth and Life Systems Alliance at the University of East Anglia and from the core strategic grant to the John Innes Centre from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC).
- Mapping technology could help farmers better understand soil
- Syngenta announces 52 new corn hybrids for 2015 season
- Ag markets posted varying losses Thursday
- Ukraine raises winter sowing pace despite dry soil
- Food ban, population influx seen boosting Russia grain demand
- ARA applauds approval of STB reauthorization bill
- Stoller soybean research produces 214 bushels per acre
- Study shows differences in understanding sustainable agriculture
- Pinnacle acquires Kansas-based Cedar Ridge Supply
- Five ways to avoid being a cultural rube
- USDA: Farm sector debt ratios near post-1970 lows
- Cargill fires first shot in legal battle over GMO trade
- Activists fighting Golden Rice even more in 2014
- U.S. GMO labeling foes triple spending in first half of this year
- Source shows half of GMO research is independent
- White House issues veto threat on bill to block WOTUS rule
- USDA invites public comments on climate report
- Stoller soybean research produces 214 bushels per acre