AgProfessional Magazine

AgProfessional magazine is a monthly magazine that provides editorial and advertising for agronomic and business management solutions specifically to agricultural retailers/distributors, professional farm managers and crop consultants.

View Current Issue/Archives | Subscribe to the Magazine

The latest news and information of specific interest to farm managers, crop consultants, ag retailers and the ag industry professionals serving them is delivered weekly on Monday in this e-newsletter.

View Current Issue | Subscribe Now | View Archives

News specific to inform, educate and assist ag retailers is delivered in this e-newsletter weekly each Thursday. Circulation is limited to only ag retailer/distributor management and employees.

View Current Issue | Subscribe Now | View Archives
Decision Engine Logo
  Search Term:
  Crop:

Quick Search Clear


Advertise on this site


Whole Foods to require GM foods to be labeled by 2018

Colleen Scherer, Managing Editor, Ag Professional  |   March 12, 2013
decrease font size resize text increase font size

One retail grocery chain may be able to do what several states have been trying to do through legislation—require food containing genetically modified ingredients to be labeled. Whole Foods Market announced last week that it would require all GM food sold in its stores to be labeled. Whole Foods Market is the first grocery chain to make such an announcement.

The new labeling requirement would be put in place within five years, said A. C. Gallo, president of Whole Foods. He claimed that the move was inspired by consumer demand. “We’ve seen how our customers have responded to the products we do have labeled. Some of our manufacturers say they’ve seen a 15 percent increase in sales of products they have labeled,” Gallo told The New York Times.

All 339 Whole Food stores in the United States and Canada would be included in the new labeling requirement. Its seven stores in Britain already label products that contain GM ingredients.

The announcement comes within four months of voters rejecting a GM labeling bill in California that would have required all products that contained GM ingredients to be labeled within the state. This would have essentially forced all food manufacturers to rewrite their food labels. Since the Proposition 37 was defeated in November 2012, other states have tried picking up the mantle through various bills with varying success.

Whole Foods’ announcement was met with opposition from the Grocery Manufacturers Association, which issued a statement. “These labels could mislead consumers into believing that these food products are somehow different or present a special risk or a potential risk,” Louis Finkel, GMA’s executive director of government affairs said in a statement, the New York Times reported.

The Biotechnology Industry Organization also issued a statement against Whole Foods.

“BIO fully supports the voluntary labeling of products to meet specific demands of consumers in the marketplace. But BIO does not support attempts to label food in a way that is misleading or that confuses consumers – for example, by suggesting that there is a difference in safety or nutrition between biotech food and organic food, when there is none,” BIO announced in a statement.

Proponents of requiring food manufacturers to label GM ingredients approved of Whole Foods’ announcement and called the move a “game changer.”

“Whole Foods is doing the right thing for consumers by giving them more information about what is in their food,” said Gary Hirshberg, chairman of Stonyfield Farm and board chair of Organic Voices. “We urge other business leaders to work with us to give every American the same right as consumers in 62 other countries. More than 90 percent of Americans want the right to know whether their food contains GE ingredients so that they can make the best choices for their families.”


Comments (2) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Valentine Dyall    
Report Abuse
Europe  |  March, 13, 2013 at 12:21 PM

It does, of course, depend on what the label says.

If it were to read: “Prepared/contains ingredients from genetically engineered crop plants thereby ensuring that this food is well up to the normal high standard of Whole Foods products” some people might object but others would not.

However, if the label said “Prepared/contains ingredients from Frankenstein plants; not up to Whole Foods normal high standards for products” others might object but some would not.

Whole Foods may be living in interesting times in 2018.

Justin    
Report Abuse
March, 29, 2013 at 11:31 AM

Whole Foods could very well be gone by then too.
It would be interesting if producers just told them to f off and see what WF would do then?

Feedback Form
Feedback Form