Vermont legislature considering GMO food labeling

decrease font size  Resize text   increase font size       Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Vermont’s state legislature is the next state to consider a bill that would require food be labeled if it contained genetically modified ingredients. On Thursday, Vermont’s House approved a bill (H.112) that would require GMOs to be labeled on all food.

The bill was advanced on a 107-37 vote and now waits to be approved by the Senate. If the Senate approves the bill, it will take effect two years after the date it is passed or 18 months after at least two other states adopt similar bills, whichever comes first. So the earliest it would be required to label GMOs is 2015.

The bill would require food manufacturers to label food produced through genetic engineering and would prohibit this use of the term “natural” on labels. The new bill exempts meat and dairy products from requiring a label for GMOs.

Support for GMO labeling is considered strong in Vermont by Falko Schilling, a consumer protection advocate with the Vermont Public Interest Research Group. Schilling said a recent study from the University of Vermont’s Center for Rural Studies showed that 95 percent of people in Vermont support GMO labeling.

Critics of the bill say it goes too far in its regulations. Rep. Harvey Smith (R-New Haven), a long-time farmer that recently started using genetic engineering technology on his dairy farm, told, “If you look at the labeling and there’s any corn, any canola, any soy ingredients in there, you can be darn sure there’s a 95 percent chance that you’re buying GMO food.”

“We’re really making some great gains in our productivity and our ability to reduce the use of herbicides and pesticides, and we’re afraid we’re going to lose our ability to use this new technology,” Smith said during the Republican caucus.

Anti-GMO groups applauded the House’s passage of the bill. However, Assistant Attorney General Bridget Asay told lawmakers that biotechnology companies would probably sue the state over First Amendment rights and that federal preemption questions would likely be raised over the issue if it is signed into law.

Buyers Guide

Doyle Equipment Manufacturing Co.
Doyle Equipment Manufacturing prides themselves as being “The King of the Rotary’s” with their Direct Drive Rotary Blend Systems. With numerous setup possibilities and sizes, ranging from a  more...
A.J. Sackett Sons & Company
Sackett Blend Towers feature the H.I.M, High Intensity Mixer, the next generation of blending and coating technology which supports Precision Fertilizer Blending®. Its unique design allows  more...
R&R Manufacturing Inc.
The R&R Minuteman Blend System is the original proven performer. Fast, precise blending with a compact foot print. Significantly lower horsepower requirement. Low inload height with large  more...
Junge Control Inc.
Junge Control Inc. creates state-of-the-art product blending and measuring solutions that allow you to totally maximize operating efficiency with amazing accuracy and repeatability, superior  more...
Yargus Manufacturing
The flagship blending system for the Layco product line is the fully automated Layco DW System™. The advanced technology of the Layco DW (Declining Weight) system results in a blending  more...
Yargus Manufacturing
The LAYCOTE™ Automated Coating System provides a new level of coating accuracy for a stand-alone coating system or for coating (impregnating) in an automated blending system. The unique  more...
John Deere
The DN345 Drawn Dry Spreader can carry more than 12 tons of fertilizer and 17.5 tons of lime. Designed to operate at field speeds up to 20 MPH with full loads and the G4 spreader uniformly  more...
Force Unlimited
The Pro-Force is a multi-purpose spreader with a wider apron and steeper sides. Our Pro-Force has the most aggressive 30” spinner on the market, and is capable of spreading higher rates of  more...
BBI Spreaders
MagnaSpread 2 & MagnaSpread 3 — With BBI’s patented multi-bin technology, these spreaders operate multiple hoppers guided by independent, variable-rate technology. These models are built on  more...

Comments (3) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Renville  |  May, 13, 2013 at 03:47 PM

Easy soloution would be not to ship food to the three states that are enacting this type of legislation. They can simple grow their food in gardens, hand weed it and provide food for their household. The other 47 states can enjoy the benefits of having hardworking American farmers raise the safe food that this country has enjoyed for 500 years.

Ames  |  May, 14, 2013 at 09:00 AM

I have a better idea. How about we just stop buying GMO frankengrain from these welfare queen farmers in the Cornbelt. If the whole country cut back on grain consumption and ate more fresh fruits and veggies we would all be a lot healthier. Then these rich farmers can burn as much of the industrial GMO grain into ethanol as they want. Better that it goes into gas tanks than into our bodies. Where I live, these rich farmers work 4 months of the year and drive brand new trucks. They are all multimillionaires that have earned fortunes off the back of the taxpayer via handouts, subsidies and the ridiculous corn ethanol mandate. No sympathy for the farm lobby whatsoever. If the farm lobby can't understand that people don't want GMO and its health consequences and don't like industrial agriculture, then maybe they deserve to go broke for not listening to the customer!

Charles Sutherland    
Virginia  |  May, 28, 2013 at 07:52 AM

When a company fears putting labels on its own food products, the question is 'how many toxic chemicals are they hiding?' Charles Sutherland, author, 'The Poison Planters'


YOUR BEST HARVEST IS NOW WITHIN REACH J&M introduces their patented line of X-tended Reach grain carts, featuring a frontfolding single ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Feedback Form