USDA: prevented planting insurance pays too much
A new report from USDA's Inspector General concludes that prevented planting coverage provided through the federal crop insurance system pays farmers too much and discourages them from planting second crops.
The report says that the Risk Management Agency (RMA) has set current prevented planting coverage levels above the percentages of guarantees that insureds needed to cover average preplanting costs, potentially overpaying by $480 million from 2008-2011.
Further, the report concludes that RMA's decision not to apply an assigned yield to prevented planting acreage has created a disincentive to planting a second crop and indirectly penalizes those that do plant.
"Under the current policy, producers planted a second crop on only 0.1 percent of prevented planting acres," the report says. RMA generally agreed with the eight recommendations made by the Inspector General.
ASA will follow and report on proposed changes to the program, which are likely to take effect for the 2015 crop.
- Evogene announces expansion of crop protection activities
- Legacy Seeds partners with Quality Seed Genetics
- The second Green Revolution seeks to leave no farmer behind
- AGCO Minnesota facility upgrades drive quality improvements
- DuPont Crop Protection to sell certain assets to Bayer
- New research study shows the value of neonicotinoids
- ValueAct buys stake in fertilizer dealer Agrium
- Critics of Dow herbicide sue U.S. EPA over approval
- Six tips to help professionals take leaps of faith
- Nitrogen fertilization rates for corn production
- Landmark Services Co-op, Curry Seeds sign agreement
- No-till may not bring boost in global crop yields
- Los Angeles City Council votes to explore ban on GMO plants
- ASA issues statement on EPA’s neonicotinoid study
- Economist: Taxing P could reduce risk of algal blooms
- Commentary: Government wants farmers to quit farming
- Resistant weeds not controlled by fall residuals
- First responders need to prepare for agroterrorism