USDA: prevented planting insurance pays too much
A new report from USDA's Inspector General concludes that prevented planting coverage provided through the federal crop insurance system pays farmers too much and discourages them from planting second crops.
The report says that the Risk Management Agency (RMA) has set current prevented planting coverage levels above the percentages of guarantees that insureds needed to cover average preplanting costs, potentially overpaying by $480 million from 2008-2011.
Further, the report concludes that RMA's decision not to apply an assigned yield to prevented planting acreage has created a disincentive to planting a second crop and indirectly penalizes those that do plant.
"Under the current policy, producers planted a second crop on only 0.1 percent of prevented planting acres," the report says. RMA generally agreed with the eight recommendations made by the Inspector General.
ASA will follow and report on proposed changes to the program, which are likely to take effect for the 2015 crop.
- Commentary: Blame anti-GMO groups for deaths
- Julie Borlaug says biotech is necessary in fight against hunger
- What does “sustainable” food and agriculture really mean?
- Ohio bill to require certification to apply fertilizer
- Carbon-dioxide hurts nitrogen assimilation by plants
- DuPont calls on Congress to preserve RFS