Syngenta, Bayer challenge EU bee-saving pesticide ban
Swiss agrichemical giant Syngenta and German chemicals group Bayer said they were taking legal action against the European Commission over its suspension of the use of an insecticide it blames for killing bees.
The two companies, which announced their challenges separately, said they were bringing their cases before the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg.
"We would prefer not to take legal action but have no other choice given our firm belief that the Commission wrongly linked thiamethoxam to the decline in bee health," Syngenta chief operating officer John Atkin said in a statement.
In neighbouring Germany, a spokesman for Bayer said its agrochemical division Bayer CropScience had submitted its legal complaint in the middle of this month and wanted clarity for the sake of future investment.
The European Commission announced in May that it was temporarily banning the use of Syngenta's thiamethoxam, which is also sold under the name Cruiser. The product is used to treat seeds and is applied to the soil or sprayed on bee-attractive plants and cereals.
It simultaneously banned two pesticides produced by Bayer, and expanded the ban last month to a fourth pesticide made by another German company, BASF.
Syngenta and the other companies have insisted their products cannot be blamed for a very sharp decline in the bee population.
Bee numbers have slumped in Europe and the United States in recent years because of a mysterious plague dubbed colony collapse disorder (CCD), which some reports have said has resulted in a loss of more than 40 percent of hives across the United States.
This has stoked fears over future food security, since bees account for 80 percent of plant pollination by insects, which is vital to global food production.
Without the work of bees, many crops would be unable to bear fruit or would have to be pollinated by hand.
But Syngenta insisted on Tuesday that it was being wrongly blamed for the problem.
"The Commission took the decision on the basis of a flawed process, an inaccurate and incomplete assessment by the European Food Safety Authority and without the full support of EU Member States," the company insisted.
The Bayer spokesman told AFP meanwhile that the company needed "dependable basic conditions with regard to future investment decisions".
No new facts had come to light since the products' approval, he argued. "In our opinion there are no new scientific findings," he said.
After the Swiss company's announcement, European Commission officials said the body "takes note" of the Syngenta statement and said it had based its measures on scientific information.
- Scout for aphids in winter wheat
- El Niño development stalled out, but wet winter still predicted
- Ag markets posted divergent closes Wednesday
- Farm bill program to help farmers affected by severe weather
- Israel panel proposes 25-42% tax hike on mining companies
- Ag markets moved almost unanimously higher Wednesday morning
- How much corn can the ethanol industry use?
- Economist: Taxing P could reduce risk of algal blooms
- Commentary: Government wants farmers to quit farming
- What is the relationship between maturity group, yield?
- Commentary: Ambulance-chaser lawyers take on Syngenta
- Berman: Camouflaged activists threaten agriculture