Sustainability metrics too tight for every farm
The measurement of sustainability from one farm to the next farm seems almost impossible based on a single set of metrics or a tightly written definition. A large-scale potato producer brought the problem home better than any row-crop producer, although the problem persists for all farming, during the recent Bayer CropScience 2012 Ag Issues Forum.
The potato producer based in Idaho, talked about sustainability and how his operation is trying its best to be sustainable within the definitions being thrown at it by different retail potato marketers. I listened intently during the forum in Nashville, and came away thinking that the producer brought up some really important ideas.
Bob Meek, chief executive officer of Wada Farms Marketing Group, explained that applying the same sustainable techniques on every potato farm will not work. Each farm has to be handled differently to grow potatoes.
“Our five farms in Idaho, each of which is drastically different, requires different farming techniques, different inputs and totally different measurements,” Meek said. He then noted that “you cannot measure us compared to Wisconsin, Colorado, Washington or California for potato growing because they require different inputs.”
He said the Wada Farms Marketing Group has a large operation in growing and marketing potatoes, and at least three different retailer chains have asked for cooperation in how “we define and establish a system so that we can rate our suppliers and be assured that we are buying from the most sustainably active suppliers.”
Meek said there are so many voices about defining sustainability. “How do you get 10 different languages to become a common language? It is very difficult. I think that is one of the greatest challenges we face as an industry, especially on the retail side of the market. How do you define what is good, what is acceptable or not acceptable?”
The most important aspect of sustainability is what farmers have said. “A good grower is not in business today unless he is sustainable,” he said. And operating their farm with a “clear conscious” is what a farmer needs to do.
Precision agriculture technology is the way to become even more sustainable in agriculture for the foreseeable future. “Whether there is new technology or no technology, we need to think of improvements so that we can do something better today than we did yesterday,” Meek said.
There are activist groups that seem to think that improvement should be continuous, and they aren’t really assisting in the overall solutions.
- EIA expects global oil consumption to grow in 2014
- Soy, wheat markets surged Tuesday
- Work underway to improve malting barley quality
- Commentary: Water police, part two: EPA proposal won't help ag
- Ukraine-Russia situation apparently boosted wheat futures again
- New and cool thought-leadership opportunities with LinkedIn
- Commentary: Blame anti-GMO groups for deaths
- Julie Borlaug says biotech is necessary in fight against hunger
- What does “sustainable” food and agriculture really mean?
- Climate change will reduce crop yields sooner than we thought
- Ohio bill to require certification to apply fertilizer
- Carbon-dioxide hurts nitrogen assimilation by plants