Suspected Bt corn rootworm resistance in Pennsylvania

decrease font size  Resize text   increase font size       Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

For the past few years, folks in Pennsylvania have heard reports from Midwestern states of continuous corn growers struggling to control populations of western corn rootworms that developed resistance to some Bt corn varieties. Thus far, this problem has occurred elsewhere, with the closest fields with suspected resistance found in central Michigan and New York north of Ithaca. Unfortunately, this problem may now have found a home in Pennsylvania.

Last week near Belleville (Mifflin County), we explored three fields that were heavily damaged by western corn rootworms. The fields had many lodged and goose-necking plants, and the root ratings conducted showed that rootworms had removed more than 2 to 2.5 nodes of roots (on a 3-point scale) from many of the plants. Further, these fields hosted very large populations of adult beetles, which, of course, a few weeks earlier had been larvae feeding happily on the roots. These beetles had fed heavily upon leaves and had decimated silks on nearly all the ears.

There were three corn varieties planted in these fields, two that expressed the YieldGard rootworm trait (Cry3Bb1 toxin) and one expressing one of the Agrisure rootworm trait (mCry3A toxin). Gene checks on the plants confirmed they were producing the appropriate rootworm-targeting toxins. Most importantly, all of these features are identical to those of fields in the Midwest where resistance to Bt by rootworm populations has been confirmed by university entomologists. At this point, the fields in Pennsylvania are suspected to have resistant populations of rootworm beetles, but verification of this suspicion will occur over the coming months via work with offspring of the beetles collected from those fields.

The main goal of raising the issue here is to emphasize that this problem can indeed occur in Pennsylvania and that these fields in Mifflin County are unlikely to be alone. We encourage growers, consultants, and other agricultural professionals to be aware of the possibility of encountering this problem in your part of the state, and know the warning signs detailed above. Recall that this is a problem for continuous corn; many of our dairies are at risk if they plant corn in the same fields year after year.

At this time of the year, there is little to do to manage the problem; treating populations of adult beetles is ineffective, so solutions will have to be implemented next spring. The easiest way to fix this problem, or to prevent it from developing, is to regularly rotate fields from corn to soybeans or alfalfa (or some other non-corn crop for next growing season); try to avoid growing corn continuously in any field for more than two or three years. Pennsylvania does not have populations of rotational-resistant rootworms — rootworm beetles that lay their eggs in soybean fields rather than corn fields and the larvae hatch from eggs and emerge in first-year corn — and we do not expect them to arrive any time soon. If rotation out of corn is not possible, switch to Bt hybrids that have more than one protein active against rootworms. Finally, ensure that your fields fully comply with refuge requirements. Planting of refuges is required and can help prevent evolution of resistance.

The bottom line is that relying on one tactic for too long is a prescription for evolution resistance. Just like we have seen with glyphosate-resistant weeds, rootworm beetles are skilled at adapting to consistent management tactics. Change up your approach to stay one step ahead of this important pest. To read more about this topic, please see our factsheet on managing potential rootworm resistance to Bt.


Buyers Guide

Doyle Equipment Manufacturing Co.
Doyle Equipment Manufacturing prides themselves as being “The King of the Rotary’s” with their Direct Drive Rotary Blend Systems. With numerous setup possibilities and sizes, ranging from a  more...
A.J. Sackett Sons & Company
Sackett Blend Towers feature the H.I.M, High Intensity Mixer, the next generation of blending and coating technology which supports Precision Fertilizer Blending®. Its unique design allows  more...
R&R Manufacturing Inc.
The R&R Minuteman Blend System is the original proven performer. Fast, precise blending with a compact foot print. Significantly lower horsepower requirement. Low inload height with large  more...
Junge Control Inc.
Junge Control Inc. creates state-of-the-art product blending and measuring solutions that allow you to totally maximize operating efficiency with amazing accuracy and repeatability, superior  more...
Yargus Manufacturing
The flagship blending system for the Layco product line is the fully automated Layco DW System™. The advanced technology of the Layco DW (Declining Weight) system results in a blending  more...
Yargus Manufacturing
The LAYCOTE™ Automated Coating System provides a new level of coating accuracy for a stand-alone coating system or for coating (impregnating) in an automated blending system. The unique  more...
John Deere
The DN345 Drawn Dry Spreader can carry more than 12 tons of fertilizer and 17.5 tons of lime. Designed to operate at field speeds up to 20 MPH with full loads and the G4 spreader uniformly  more...
Force Unlimited
The Pro-Force is a multi-purpose spreader with a wider apron and steeper sides. Our Pro-Force has the most aggressive 30” spinner on the market, and is capable of spreading higher rates of  more...
BBI Spreaders
MagnaSpread 2 & MagnaSpread 3 — With BBI’s patented multi-bin technology, these spreaders operate multiple hoppers guided by independent, variable-rate technology. These models are built on  more...


Comments (3) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Dan Weber    
Snake Run, Indiana  |  August, 14, 2014 at 08:21 AM

I recently retired from being involved with Ag Retail and Wholesale for 39 years. I believe one of the problems with resistance to the BT trait and glyphosate chemicals is self imposed by growers who wanted to cut the rates. I was running a retail branch in mid-70's when Roundup was introduced. Some farmers found out you could cut the rate, save a couple of dollars and get pretty good control. Compared to what their fields looked like before glyphosate...very good control. We talked about resistance.....they were too short sighted and continued to cut the recommended rate. Talking to a large grower about buying refuge seedcorn for his fields, told me his seed corn supplier would do a dummy invoice to show he bought enoug if audited but was not going to take the time and planted all BT traited seedcorn. I don't think these are isolated instances. Kind of sad when some growers shoot themselves in the foot and eventually all farmers feel the pain inflicted by their "I don't have to follow the label or rules, it won't hurt anything and I will save a buck." I've seen the results of this attitude in fields where nature has beaten science.

Jeff Byler    
Belleville,PA  |  August, 14, 2014 at 03:28 PM

I have been a custom applicator at a retail location in central PA for 38 years.. I second everything Dan Weber posted about weed & insect resistance. Same rate cutting & refuge cheating going on in this part of the country.. Thanks for your post Dan.. I will back you 100%..

Arthur Welser    
Latham(Albany) NY  |  August, 14, 2014 at 09:13 PM

To date we are poor managers. We should be handling resistance as if it were an invasive species and nipping resistance in the bud rather than allowing our fellow producers to grow in neighboring fields "without a plan" and have an element of financial help to implement the change in management. A stitch in time, saves 9!


Pacesetter Grain Hopper

The Pacesetter Gain Hopper features original and innovative ideas like the patented RollerTrap™, the industry’s easiest to open and maintain trap ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Feedback Form