Short corn crop, long price tail - Are we there yet?
The drought-reduced U.S. corn crop of 2012 created expectations that corn prices would follow a "short crop, long tail" price pattern characterized by a price peak early in the marketing year, followed by an unpredictable pattern of declining prices and a return to pre-drought price levels. With a short crop, high prices early in the marketing year signal the necessity to reduce consumption, with subsequent price declines reflecting the reduced rate of consumption and eventually a return to more abundant U.S. and world supplies.
Prices were elevated even before the drought of 2012 due to a combination of below-trend yields in the U.S. in 2010 and 2011, a small Argentine corn crop in 2012, and robust corn demand for ethanol production. Spot cash prices in central Illinois averaged about $3.10 in September 2009, increased to near $7.35 in April 2011, declined to just under $6.00 in December 2011, and peaked at $8.15 in August 2012. The peak in the daily average price was near $8.50. The average spot cash price in central Illinois was near $5.80 in late May 2012, just before drought conditions unfolded, and was at $5.81 on August 2, 2013. The cash bid for harvest delivery is near $4.40. Prices since last summer have generally followed the expected pattern.
While corn prices have behaved as expected, the consumption response to high prices was not as expected. The bulk of the consumption response was in the export market. With less than a month left in the 2012-13 marketing year, U.S. corn exports are expected to reach only 700 million bushels, 843 million less than exported last year, and 550 million less than the USDA forecast in September 2012. The sharp decline is in contrast to previous short crop, high priced years when exports remained strong. The decline reflects, at least in part, the increased feed grain production in the rest of the world in response to high prices in recent years. In contrast, domestic feed and residual use of corn this year is expected to total 4.45 billion bushels, only 95 million less than consumed last year and 300 million more than the USDA's September 2012 projection. The sharp decline in exports resulted in larger domestic availability than expected and required a much smaller reduction in domestic livestock production than anticipated. Ethanol use of corn this year is expected to be 150 million bushels larger than projected last fall, again due to more abundant domestic corn supplies.
With December 2013 corn futures now trading under $4.60, the question is whether or not the long tail price pattern is complete. Evidence for addressing that question is in two categories: consumption prospects for U.S. corn and size of the 2013 U.S. corn crop. There are clear prospects for increased consumption of U.S. corn during the year ahead if new crop prices remain near or below current levels. In the case of domestic feed consumption, prospects are bolstered by indications of expanding broiler and hog production. The number of broiler chicks placed for meat production in the first seven months of the year was near the level of a year ago, with year-over-year increases of one to four percent in recent weeks. Prospects of lower feed prices are expected to result in a continuation of the recent expansion. The USDA's June Hogs and Pigs report revealed intentions for modest expansion in hog production, which could accelerate with confirmation of a large U.S. corn crop and continued strong hog prices. Corn used for ethanol production could get a modest boost from increased E85 consumption as lower corn prices and continued high gasoline prices will make it possible for E85 to be competitively priced with E10 on an energy equivalent basis. The question is how fast E85 consumption can increase under favorable economic conditions given the current infrastructure limitations.
- EIA expects global oil consumption to grow in 2014
- Soy, wheat markets surged Tuesday
- Work underway to improve malting barley quality
- Commentary: Water police, part two: EPA proposal won't help ag
- Ukraine-Russia situation apparently boosted wheat futures again
- New and cool thought-leadership opportunities with LinkedIn
- Commentary: Blame anti-GMO groups for deaths
- Julie Borlaug says biotech is necessary in fight against hunger
- What does “sustainable” food and agriculture really mean?
- Climate change will reduce crop yields sooner than we thought
- Ohio bill to require certification to apply fertilizer
- Carbon-dioxide hurts nitrogen assimilation by plants