Senate plan would cap farmers at $125,000 a year in subsidies
U.S. farmers would be limited to $125,000 a year in crop subsidies in a significant tightening of farm support rules proposed by four senators from farm and ranch states on Tuesday.
There is no effective limit on payments now. Large operators collect the lion's share of subsidies because they are based on each bushel of grain or pound of cotton grown on a farm.
"It's time to get the program back to its original intent," said Senator Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican and a sponsor of the bill who is a long-time proponent of strict limits. He said the farm program, dating from the 1930s, was aimed at protecting small and medium-size family farms.
Besides putting a "hard" cap on payments per farmer, the bill would crack down on payments to investors and absentee landlords. Under it, only one person living in town could collect subsidies for providing management on a given farm.
Passage of the package "would put an end to widespread abuse in farm programs," said the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, which represents small farmers. It said the chances for passage of a new farm bill would be boosted by the inclusion of meaningful payment limits.
Although the Senate included similar reforms in its farm bill last year, the version approved by the House Agriculture Committee rejected them. Both bills died at the end of 2012 so Congress must start over on the bill this year.
Grassley said he was confident the Senate would adopt the package this year. Senators Mike Enzi, an Wyoming Republican; Tim Johnson, a South Dakota Democrat; and Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat, joined Grassley as sponsors. Brown and Grassley are members of the Senate Agriculture Committee.
PAYMENT LIMITS ARE FIGHTING WORDS IN CONGRESS
The senators proposal would allow grain, cotton and soybean growers to collect up to $50,000 a year for all crop subsidies and $75,000 annually from the marketing loan program, for a total of $125,000 per farmer. The total would double to $250,000 for a married couple.
At present, there is a $105,000 limit per farmer, or $210,000 per couple, on crop subsidies and no limit on marketing loan benefits, so there is no overall limit on payments.
The senators said a stricter definition of who qualifies for subsidies, known as the "actively engaged" rule, would greatly reduce the flow of subsidies to investors and absentee owners who take no role in running a farm but who say they provide key management direction.
Farm subsidies are available to people who provide land, equipment or capital and 1,000 hours of labor per year or active management. A decade ago, a congressional commission suggested more stringent rules on what qualifies as management.
"For too long farm program payments have gone to producers who do not need the support -- and sometimes to people who are not involved in farming," said Brown.
The 2008 farm law was the first to deny subsidies to the wealthiest farmers, or those with more than $1.25 million in adjusted gross income. It also ended the "three-entity rule" that allowed growers to collect subsidies directly and through two affiliates.
Payment limits are a perennially divisive issue in U.S. agriculture, pitting cotton and rice growers in the South against the wheat, corn and soybean farmers of the Plains and Midwest, and big operators against small farmers. Cotton and rice have the highest support rates but also high costs of production. (Reporting By Charles Abbott; Editing by Leslie Adler)
- Court ruling in Hawaii finds that crop protection is state law
- Touch spurs plant-microbe interaction
- Canola’s genome sequenced
- BioConsortia opens headquarters, R&D facilities in California
- Potash Ridge enters into operating partnership with Tetra Tech
- Agrium partners with Actagro for soil, plant health products
- No El Niño in 2014? Drought-weary California in trouble
- Suspected Bt corn rootworm resistance in Pennsylvania
- Soybean aphid numbers on the rise
- BioNitrogen to build second fertilizer plant in Texas
- Commentary: Setting the record straight on 'Waters of the U.S.'
- Anti-GMO proposal denounced at Safeway shareholder meeting