New poll shows support for fuel standard, RFS
For the second year in a row, national polling presented at the National Ethanol Conference proved Americans, by an overwhelming majority, support the key federal policy driving renewable fuel innovation in America today—the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS).
In a poll commissioned by the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) and conducted by American Viewpoint, 64 percent of adults polled said they supported the RFS, while just 25 percent are opposed.
“Clearly and demonstrably, Americans believe that the Renewable Fuel Standard is an important federal policy that results in more energy independence, more job creation, and a cleaner environment. They see the value of the RFS in strengthening America, now and in the future” said RFA President and CEO Bob Dinneen. “This polling tells us there is a widely held distaste for the billions in support that the oil industry receives from the federal government as well as a strong desire to move away from foreign oil. Americans want fuel choice at the pump and at the auto dealer. Investment in future biofuels made from a variety of non-traditional products like wood chips and grasses is of keen interest to them.”
The poll was commissioned by RFA and conducted by American Viewpoint. The poll was conducted via telephone January 24-28, 2013 with a sample size of 1,000 adults. Margin of error in the poll is +/- 3.1 percent. Approximately 30 percent of respondents were contacted by cell phone.
The questions as posed make it hard to be in opposition to the RFA point of view because they include the positives for ethanol and renewable fuels and the negatives about Big Oil, as the RFA refers to it in most presentations around the country.
The following are the exact questions posed to poll respondents and the results.
As you may know, there is currently a renewable fuels standard that requires a certain amount of the fuel produced each year to come from ethanol, bio-diesel and other renewable sources that aren't fossil fuels in order to reduce foreign oil dependence and greenhouse gas emissions. Do you favor or oppose this requirement?
Don’t Know: 10%
Some have considered the government giving incentives to help fund the expansion of a new technology known as Cellulosic ethanol, which is a biofuel produced from wood, grasses and other non-edible parts of plants. Do you favor or oppose these incentives?
Don’t Know: 11%
As you may know, oil companies receive four to five billion dollars in government subsidies and special tax treatment and incentives for things like equipment depreciation, oil depletion allowances, and foreign investment tax credits for taxes they pay in foreign countries. Do you favor or oppose these tax incentives?
Don’t know: 11%
Do you favor or oppose requiring automobile manufacturers to build cars that will run on fuel sources other than oil, such as electricity, natural gas and bio-fuels?
Don’t Know: 4%
- Adequate rhizobia populations help protect soybean yields
- In-season imagery helps farmers grow and protect healthy crops
- Ag markets proved rather volatile Wednesday afternoon
- Farm Bill enables record USDA investments in rural water systems
- Ag markets diverged Wednesday morning
- Do soybeans need N fertilizer?
- Commentary: Blame anti-GMO groups for deaths
- Julie Borlaug says biotech is necessary in fight against hunger
- What does “sustainable” food and agriculture really mean?
- Ohio bill to require certification to apply fertilizer
- Carbon-dioxide hurts nitrogen assimilation by plants
- FCC aims to offer high-speed internet to rural America