Few farms receive both conservation and commodity payments
Existing conservation and farm commodity programs serve multiple purposes.
click image to zoom Commodity-based income programs are intended to support farm families historically involved in the production of targeted "program" crops.
Conservation payments, on the other hand, are designed to promote environmentally beneficial changes in farmland use or production practices.
Conservation payments are available to a much wider range of producers, with nearly all crop and livestock producers eligible for at least one conservation program.
In 2011, roughly 31 percent of all U.S. farms received commodity payments, conservation payments, or both.
Only 6 percent of farms, however, received both commodity and conservation payments.
Fifty-five percent of conservation payments went to farms that did not receive commodity payments, while 63 percent of commodity payments went to farms that did not receive conservation payments.
Since 2004, the proportion of farms receiving both conservation and commodity payments has remained fairly constant.
Thd chart updates one found in the March 2012 Amber Waves finding, Green Payments: Can Conservation and Commodity Programs Be Combined?
- Scout for aphids in winter wheat
- El Niño development stalled out, but wet winter still predicted
- Ag markets posted divergent closes Wednesday
- Farm bill program to help farmers affected by severe weather
- Israel panel proposes 25-42% tax hike on mining companies
- Ag markets moved almost unanimously higher Wednesday morning
- How much corn can the ethanol industry use?
- Economist: Taxing P could reduce risk of algal blooms
- Commentary: Government wants farmers to quit farming
- Source shows half of GMO research is independent
- Ag markets made a generally mixed showing Thursday night
- What is the relationship between maturity group, yield?