Few farms receive both conservation and commodity payments
Existing conservation and farm commodity programs serve multiple purposes.
click image to zoom Commodity-based income programs are intended to support farm families historically involved in the production of targeted "program" crops.
Conservation payments, on the other hand, are designed to promote environmentally beneficial changes in farmland use or production practices.
Conservation payments are available to a much wider range of producers, with nearly all crop and livestock producers eligible for at least one conservation program.
In 2011, roughly 31 percent of all U.S. farms received commodity payments, conservation payments, or both.
Only 6 percent of farms, however, received both commodity and conservation payments.
Fifty-five percent of conservation payments went to farms that did not receive commodity payments, while 63 percent of commodity payments went to farms that did not receive conservation payments.
Since 2004, the proportion of farms receiving both conservation and commodity payments has remained fairly constant.
Thd chart updates one found in the March 2012 Amber Waves finding, Green Payments: Can Conservation and Commodity Programs Be Combined?
- Farmland price outlook in 2014 and beyond
- Climate change to cut South Asia's growth 9% by 2100
- Tumbling livestock quotes led ag commodites lower Wednesday
- As risk of drought rises, Australian farmers struggle to invest
- Soybean aphids make an unusual appearance
- Livestock futures led most ag markets lower Wednesday morning
- No El Niño in 2014? Drought-weary California in trouble
- Suspected Bt corn rootworm resistance in Pennsylvania
- BioNitrogen to build second fertilizer plant in Texas
- Soybean aphid numbers on the rise
- Commentary: Setting the record straight on 'Waters of the U.S.'
- Fall burndown benefits go beyond weed control