FAPRI report compares House, Senate farm bill provisions
The Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) at the University of Missouri-Columbia released a new report last week comparing the House and Senate farm bills.
The analysis examined possible policy changes including the elimination of the direct payment and ACRE programs, common features of both bills, and the establishment of new programs intended to provide safety net coverage for growers in different regions and of different crops.
The report makes assumptions about participation and payment per acre for new programs proposed in both drafts. Of particular note, the FAPRI analysis concluded that the Senate bill would save $5.5 billion more than the House version, which is contrary to Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis predicting a less than $1 billion difference between the two bills.
The report also briefly considered the impacts of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) caps, impacts to the renewable fuels standard (RFS) and World Trade Organization (WTO) concerns.
The report is available by clicking here.
- Bio company plans new products in 2015
- Two major sustainability efforts announced by mayors
- September forecast raises corn yield
- USDA chief says urged Buffett to ready BNSF for record crops
- NGFA, other ag groups commend introduction of Senate rail bill
- Registration for AgGateway’s annual conference now open
- Activists fighting Golden Rice even more in 2014
- U.S. GMO labeling foes triple spending in first half of this year
- Source shows half of GMO research is independent
- White House issues veto threat on bill to block WOTUS rule
- Stoller soybean research produces 214 bushels per acre
- USDA invites public comments on climate report