FAPRI report compares House, Senate farm bill provisions
The Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) at the University of Missouri-Columbia released a new report last week comparing the House and Senate farm bills.
The analysis examined possible policy changes including the elimination of the direct payment and ACRE programs, common features of both bills, and the establishment of new programs intended to provide safety net coverage for growers in different regions and of different crops.
The report makes assumptions about participation and payment per acre for new programs proposed in both drafts. Of particular note, the FAPRI analysis concluded that the Senate bill would save $5.5 billion more than the House version, which is contrary to Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis predicting a less than $1 billion difference between the two bills.
The report also briefly considered the impacts of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) caps, impacts to the renewable fuels standard (RFS) and World Trade Organization (WTO) concerns.
The report is available by clicking here.
- Adequate rhizobia populations help protect soybean yields
- In-season imagery helps farmers grow and protect healthy crops
- Ag markets proved rather volatile Wednesday afternoon
- Farm Bill enables record USDA investments in rural water systems
- Ag markets diverged Wednesday morning
- Do soybeans need N fertilizer?
- Commentary: Blame anti-GMO groups for deaths
- Julie Borlaug says biotech is necessary in fight against hunger
- What does “sustainable” food and agriculture really mean?
- Ohio bill to require certification to apply fertilizer
- FCC aims to offer high-speed internet to rural America
- Carbon-dioxide hurts nitrogen assimilation by plants