Electricity was focus of day two of safety school
BLOOMINGTON, ILL.—The National Agronomic Environmental Health and Safety School of 2012 concluded as the Midwest Ag Industries Exposition (MAGIE) began.
The longest presentation of the entire two-day safety school concluded the school before lunch. Bob LoMastro, president of LoMasto & Associates, Inc., which specializes in safety training services, provided a multi-media presentation about electrical hazards. As he noted, “all of us are exposed to electricity.”
The blame for coming into contact with electrical hazards has to be put on management when an employee is told to just do a job without verification that the employee is trained to deal with electrical situations—whether that be replacing an electrical outlet or not having the proper non-conductive gloves when doing a lock out/tag out. An employee needs to be qualified or stay completely away from doing anything related to electrical.
Additionally, LoMastro suggested it is better to have more than a single person making decisions involved with safety procedures to follow. Two or three people think of different solutions for problems.
Safe isn’t the word for dealing with electricity when SAFE stands for Shock; Arc Flash; Falls, fires, foul-ups; and Electrocutions (which means death). He went through a discussion of all these with a constant interaction with the school attendees.
Kris Phillips, hazardous materials program manager, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Midwestern Service Center, talked about the re-definition of tank vehicles, which has hit up against some push-back from a few state Departments of Transportation.
She talked about the requirement for a driver to have a tank endorsement when transporting liquid or gaseous materials that fit within the definition of a commercial motor vehicle. Phillips went through an exact explanation of the word of the 49 CFR 383.5 definition. It reads as follows: “Tank vehicles means any commercial motor vehicle that is designed to transport any liquid having an individual rated capacity of more than 119 gallons and an aggregate rated capacity of 1,000 gallons or more that is either permanently or temporarily attached to the vehicle or the chassis. A commercial motor vehicle transporting an empty storage container tank, not designed for transportation, with a rated capacity of 1,000 gallons or more that is temporarily attached to a flatbed trailer is not considered a tank vehicle.”
Mark McCloskey, environmental enforcement specialist, Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, provided a state’s view of the new EPA container and repackaging regulations or the “Repackagers.” As he noted, the refillable containers regulations from the EPA have been in place for a year.
- Soy, cotton futures led the ag markets Wednesday morning
- Monthly fertilizer prices: Comparing 2014 through 2009
- USDA releases April water supply forecast for the West
- Know your enemy: The importance of weed identification
- Most Texas farmers have corn in the ground
- Mosaic to acquire ADM's Brazil, Paraguay fertilizer business
- Commentary: Blame anti-GMO groups for deaths
- Julie Borlaug says biotech is necessary in fight against hunger
- What does “sustainable” food and agriculture really mean?
- Climate change will reduce crop yields sooner than we thought
- Ohio bill to require certification to apply fertilizer
- Carbon-dioxide hurts nitrogen assimilation by plants