Electricity was focus of day two of safety school
BLOOMINGTON, ILL.—The National Agronomic Environmental Health and Safety School of 2012 concluded as the Midwest Ag Industries Exposition (MAGIE) began.
The longest presentation of the entire two-day safety school concluded the school before lunch. Bob LoMastro, president of LoMasto & Associates, Inc., which specializes in safety training services, provided a multi-media presentation about electrical hazards. As he noted, “all of us are exposed to electricity.”
The blame for coming into contact with electrical hazards has to be put on management when an employee is told to just do a job without verification that the employee is trained to deal with electrical situations—whether that be replacing an electrical outlet or not having the proper non-conductive gloves when doing a lock out/tag out. An employee needs to be qualified or stay completely away from doing anything related to electrical.
Additionally, LoMastro suggested it is better to have more than a single person making decisions involved with safety procedures to follow. Two or three people think of different solutions for problems.
Safe isn’t the word for dealing with electricity when SAFE stands for Shock; Arc Flash; Falls, fires, foul-ups; and Electrocutions (which means death). He went through a discussion of all these with a constant interaction with the school attendees.
Kris Phillips, hazardous materials program manager, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Midwestern Service Center, talked about the re-definition of tank vehicles, which has hit up against some push-back from a few state Departments of Transportation.
She talked about the requirement for a driver to have a tank endorsement when transporting liquid or gaseous materials that fit within the definition of a commercial motor vehicle. Phillips went through an exact explanation of the word of the 49 CFR 383.5 definition. It reads as follows: “Tank vehicles means any commercial motor vehicle that is designed to transport any liquid having an individual rated capacity of more than 119 gallons and an aggregate rated capacity of 1,000 gallons or more that is either permanently or temporarily attached to the vehicle or the chassis. A commercial motor vehicle transporting an empty storage container tank, not designed for transportation, with a rated capacity of 1,000 gallons or more that is temporarily attached to a flatbed trailer is not considered a tank vehicle.”
Mark McCloskey, environmental enforcement specialist, Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, provided a state’s view of the new EPA container and repackaging regulations or the “Repackagers.” As he noted, the refillable containers regulations from the EPA have been in place for a year.
- Toro releases guide for using micro-sprinklers for IPM
- USDA to fund $25 million in value-added producer grants
- Crop futures mostly higher, livestock prices stabilizing
- Suppress Palmer pigweed with a ryegrass cover crop
- LSU researchers look for biological controls for aflatoxin
- U.S. soft red winter wheat hit hard by head scab
- Deere to lay off more than 600 at four U.S. plants
- The four pillars of seeing opportunities in problems
- Slow pace of rail recovery stirs fear of future woes
- New DuPont Afforia herbicide introduced for soybeans
- Cooperative exits retail and automotive business
- RTK brings higher level of accuracy to farmers
- No El Niño in 2014? Drought-weary California in trouble
- Suspected Bt corn rootworm resistance in Pennsylvania
- BioNitrogen to build second fertilizer plant in Texas
- Commentary: Setting the record straight on 'Waters of the U.S.'
- Soybean aphid numbers on the rise
- Solar energy jobs increase, wind power decrease