Crop variety selection: Eliminate emotion, increase profitability
The planting season is starting to sneak up on us already, and it is now less than 2 months away for crops like spring wheat. Let me assume that you still have not selected or made 100% of your seed purchases for all your crops or that your intended acres for each crop may change due to weather conditions. I think most farmers will agree that they want to buy the variety that returns the highest profit per-acre.
Most people justify a buying decision after they have already made it based on emotion. Unfortunately, seed purchases often do not escape this blight. Things that influence our selection and purchase of varieties include brand reputation, loyalty and tradition, friends and family members, advertising, and company representatives.
It seems obvious, but I always encourage growers to utilize yield data in this variety selection process. Yield data can be collected from side-by-side comparisons on the farm, company variety trials, and third-party variety trials. Reliability of this yield data is not equal. I am not talking about who (farmer, company, university) does the work, but the methodology.
There are three key methods we can use to increase our confidence that one variety does truly outperform another:
- Blocking (splitting the test plot into similar environments)
- Randomization (random placement of varieties within the test plot)
- Replication (same variety appears in the test plot several times)
Another key term I need to describe is called experimental error, which is simply variation in yield measured in the same variety that was tested independently several times within a test plot. The source of this variation can be soil difference in the test plot or even inability to reproduce the exact same conditions with equipment operations and measurements (easier to control than the former).
Let me explain why these three methods (blocking, randomization, and replication) are important when making yield data comparisons among varieties. For example, Figure 1. below may be a 2011 yield monitor data from a portion of the field where a test plot will be located in 2013 (it was all the same variety).
Figure 1. Yield monitor data from one variety planted in 2011.
What happens if we planted four varieties so the rows ran left to right this spring? Would that be a fair comparison based on what we know from 2011? No. However, blocking or splitting this area into four similar environments helps us reduce the amount of experimental error by comparing the four varieties within smaller areas with more similar conditions (Figure 2).
- Boxers or Briefs? Underwear buried to demonstrate unhealthy soil
- Tire makers race to turn dandelions into rubber
- Toro releases guide for using micro-sprinklers for IPM
- USDA to fund $25 million in value-added producer grants
- Crop futures mostly higher, livestock prices stabilizing
- Suppress Palmer pigweed with a ryegrass cover crop
- Deere to lay off more than 600 at four U.S. plants
- The four pillars of seeing opportunities in problems
- Slow pace of rail recovery stirs fear of future woes
- New DuPont Afforia herbicide introduced for soybeans
- Cooperative exits retail and automotive business
- RTK brings higher level of accuracy to farmers
- No El Niño in 2014? Drought-weary California in trouble
- Suspected Bt corn rootworm resistance in Pennsylvania
- BioNitrogen to build second fertilizer plant in Texas
- Commentary: Setting the record straight on 'Waters of the U.S.'
- Soybean aphid numbers on the rise
- Solar energy jobs increase, wind power decrease