Court dismisses Chesapeake Bay trading lawsuit
A lawsuit brought by two environmental groups against the use of pollution trading to clean up the Chesapeake Bay was dismissed Friday. The original lawsuit sought to sue the Environmental Protection Agency.
Judge Rudolph Contreras in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted a motion by the EPA to dismiss the lawsuit.
Food & Water Watch and Friends of the Earth sued the EPA in October 2012, claiming that the market-based cleanup program that is part of the EPA’s “pollution diet” for the Chesapeake Bay violates the federal Clean Water Act and would undermine efforts to restore the Bay instead of help it.
The judge ruled that the groups brought their lawsuit prematurely because EPA has not approved any pollution trades drawn up by Bay states. He also declared that the groups cannot show they had legal standing to challenge the programs.
Three months ago, a federal judge in Pennsylvania dismissed legal challenges to EPA’s authority to impose the “pollution diet”. In that case the American Farm Bureau appealed that decision.
- New calculator can help soybean farmers with seed decisions
- U.S., Brazil close to ending cotton trade rift
- U.S.-Japan trade talks hit new farm exports snag
- Ag markets posted a general comeback Wednesday
- Midwest grain growers ‘Invest an acre to feed the world’
- Ag markets turned mixed around midsession Wednesday
- Activists fighting Golden Rice even more in 2014
- U.S. GMO labeling foes triple spending in first half of this year
- Source shows half of GMO research is independent
- White House issues veto threat on bill to block WOTUS rule
- East-West Seed signs marketing collaboration with Monsanto
- How much corn can the ethanol industry use?