Connecticut might require GMO food labeling
The first state that might require labeling of processed foods that could possibly contain genetically-modified ingredients came out of the Connecticut State Senate on May 21 following a 35-1 vote.
Per a stipulation in the bill, nothing would happen unless three other states pass similar regulations about GM-food labeling before July 2016.
As in every state, where activists are attempting to get GM product labeling, Food Democracy Now!, a grassroots activist movement, was lobbying the state senate for passage. The organization claims 36 other states are considering legislation to require such labeling.
“Connecticut is setting an example for the rest of the country to follow. The time for GMO labeling is now,” said Lisa Stokke, co-founder of Food Democracy Now!. “Americans should have the right to know just as the citizens of more than 60 other countries already do.”
It is obvious that those who contend GM-food products labeling is unnecessary or should be clearly defined with appropriate language, including most food processors, crop protection companies, seed companies and agricultural trade associations, have a big task to educate and recommend appropriate labeling laws that work for the ag industry and consumers.
- New calculator can help soybean farmers with seed decisions
- U.S., Brazil close to ending cotton trade rift
- U.S.-Japan trade talks hit new farm exports snag
- Ag markets posted a general comeback Wednesday
- Midwest grain growers ‘Invest an acre to feed the world’
- Ag markets turned mixed around midsession Wednesday
- Activists fighting Golden Rice even more in 2014
- U.S. GMO labeling foes triple spending in first half of this year
- Source shows half of GMO research is independent
- White House issues veto threat on bill to block WOTUS rule
- East-West Seed signs marketing collaboration with Monsanto
- How much corn can the ethanol industry use?