A recent article in The Guardian, a United Kingdom publication, says farmers in India are losing faith in producing genetically modified cotton. The writer contends that farmers blame the manufacturers of the new seed for causing crop losses. They believe this so strongly that a court in the country has ordered Bayer CropScience to pay more than $1.1 million to more than 1,000 farmers for cotton hybrids that “did not deliver the promised yields.”

Bayer claims the yields did not occur because of “inadequate crop management and adverse environmental conditions.” The company plans to appeal the decision.

India is place that seems to want to have its cake and eat it too when it comes to growing GM cotton. Growing cotton in India was incredibly difficult before GM cotton appeared in 2002. Harvests have doubled since Indian farmers adopted the technology. What they seem to forget is that with the GM cotton is that the seed is not a magic bean. The Indians claim they were promised certain yields. However, no yield can truly be promised by any company regardless of whether the seed is genetically modified or not. Growing conditions and management have a direct effect on yield, yet the Indian farmers seem to have forgotten that.

In an example of how misguided their views are about growing GM cotton, the head of the Central Institute for Cotton Research, Keshav Raj Kranthi claims GM cotton is more susceptible to bacteria. He claims GM varieties consume more water and nutrients, leading to soil depletion, which means more fertilizer is needed.

Kranthi has it all backwards. To produce higher yields, plants need more water and fertilizer. As plants produce more yields, they do mine nutrients from the soil, but any plant does that, not just genetically modified plants.

The group Coalition for a GM-Free India wants farmers to go back to the way they used to produce cotton before GM cotton was introduced. Why does it seem that anyone anti-GMO seems to be anti-technology? It appears this group wants India to return to half of the cotton yields it produced 10 years ago. They probably want to give up their second largest cotton producer status too.

“Small farmers have no idea what they’re buying and even less idea how to grow these new varieties. Their traditional know-how is disappearing,” said Sridhar Radhakrishnan of the Coalition for a GM-Free India.

It appears that Indian farmers either were not truly educated about how to use GM seeds or simply lacked the understanding of how to change and adapt their production practices to produce the higher yields they believe they were promised. In all likelihood, the government is to blame for failing these farmers by not providing them with the financial and legal help needed.