Commentary: Requiring use of imported ethanol is stupid
There is no reason to alter the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) when the U.S. is importing ethanol from foreign sources, mainly ethanol made from Brazil’s sugarcane. And the reason this ethanol is coming into the country is Big Oil and environmental activists playing together against corn ethanol.
click image to zoom The Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) reported U.S. ethanol exports “surged to 82.4 million gallons in November, with large volumes finding their way into new or emerging markets such as China and India, as well as the Philippines, Tunisia, Panama and Mexico.”
So, with all this U.S. ethanol good enough for the rest of the world, why isn’t more of it staying home? It seems like a natural question that the American public would be asking since a main idea behind the RFS is to wean the U.S. economy off imported energy sources. And the U.S. currently is the low-cost producer of ethanol, according to the RFA.
The problem seems to be that the federal RFS and the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) classify sugarcane ethanol production as being superior to corn ethanol in terms of causing less greenhouse gases (GHG). So, even though sugarcane ethanol can cost more than U.S. corn ethanol, oil refiners are effectively required by the RFS and LCFS to use some amount of imported ethanol in order to meet GHS reduction requirements.
The RFA has contested the Environmental Protection Agency’s GHG analysis of sugarcane ethanol production being much better than corn ethanol from day one of the RFS. Not allowing the use of more corn ethanol in the U.S. isn’t saving the planet because there are all kinds of ways to look at the GHG situation, but most importantly, that corn ethanol is being produced and being burned all around the world.
The U.S. corn ethanol plants and ethanol itself are not major polluters of the world, as some activists would like to claim. And too many in Congress, the California legislator and Environmental Protection Agency have bought into the baloney of blaming corn ethanol for world problems from air pollution to keeping food from starving populations.
As the RFA continues to request, let’s have the standard blend of ethanol in gasoline increased to 15 percent from the current 10 percent. Big Oil should be forced to blend more ethanol into U.S. gasoline, just like Brazil requires a high blend mix in its country. There is even a market for U.S. corn ethanol in Brazil because of the price difference between its sugarcane ethanol and corn ethanol.
- New calculator can help soybean farmers with seed decisions
- U.S., Brazil close to ending cotton trade rift
- U.S.-Japan trade talks hit new farm exports snag
- Ag markets posted a general comeback Wednesday
- Midwest grain growers ‘Invest an acre to feed the world’
- Ag markets turned mixed around midsession Wednesday
- Activists fighting Golden Rice even more in 2014
- U.S. GMO labeling foes triple spending in first half of this year
- Source shows half of GMO research is independent
- White House issues veto threat on bill to block WOTUS rule
- East-West Seed signs marketing collaboration with Monsanto
- How much corn can the ethanol industry use?