Commentary: Official soil or new technology in New York
Who has the right to claim having the soil that should be named the official New York state soil? There apparently was a hubbub in the New York legislature recently on what was the official state soil.
I don’t care what state legislature it is. There should not be time spent debating what soil to proclaim as the state soil. There are 1,000 more important things to discuss, and agriculture shouldn’t be associated with something like this that the public sees as taking time away from other issues of state interest.
State Sen. John J. Bonacic wanted to honor the so-called “black dirt” prevalent in his downstate district in a bill he introduced. Trying to explain the difference between muck soils, which apparently are hard to maintain as quality soils over a long period of time, and mineral soils doesn’t help improve the image of farming or earn support of agriculture in a state legislature.
Spending time on legislative bills that assist in adoption of best management practices in agriculture and assisting farmers in obtaining new technology for farming would be much better time spent (One reader definitely disagrees with my position by claiming a federal conservation program for muck soils is needed, and this is an honest reason for legislature attention.)
New York state is known as a state that stands in the way of new technology adoption with its own red-tape regulatory process for approval of pesticides, only slower than California in general. The state appears to want to fund regulators and bureaucracy separate from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
So, the dirt discussion seems quite foolish, but Cornell University even took time away from other topics to issue a statement explaining that black dirt isn’t a true descriptor of soil.
Jonathan Matthew Russell-Anelli, a senior lecturer of crop and soil sciences at Cornell University and a soils expert, said, “There is a great diversity of soils across the state including the ‘black dirt’ or muck soils found in Orange and Dutchess counties. These are not a single soil, but rather a spectrum of soils made from organic materials that have been collecting in wetlands in the landscape since the last ice age, approximately 23,000 years ago.
“These muck soils, which have names such as Carlisle and Muskego, are extremely important agricultural soils that are found in parts of New York as well as the northeastern United States. They are very fertile, easy to plow, and great for onions and other cash crops. But as muck soils are often comprised completely of organic materials, they can easily decompose and even under the best management, are not sustainable as agricultural lands.
- Irrigation Association to release online courses with Cal Poly
- Monsanto to invest $120 million in Argentina
- Ag markets ended Tuesday mostly lower
- Fat molecules influence function of key photosynthesis protein
- Monsanto honored for efforts in developing agriculture in Vietnam
- Corn stocks top 1.2 billion bushels
- Activists fighting Golden Rice even more in 2014
- U.S. GMO labeling foes triple spending in first half of this year
- Source shows half of GMO research is independent
- White House issues veto threat on bill to block WOTUS rule
- How much corn can the ethanol industry use?
- East-West Seed signs marketing collaboration with Monsanto