Commentary: Millions to kill Calif. GMO labeling
The California organization heading up the campaign to pass required labeling, designating any food possibly containing a genetically modified component as a genetically engineered food, has sent a news release naming major contributors trying to defeat the labeling requirement.
Proposition 37 on the California ballot would require labeling of any food that might contain GMO ingredients, including everything from soybean meal from Roundup Ready crops to sweet corn resistant to insects.
The group pushing for labeling notes that a huge number of major agricultural-based companies, either those supporting growers who produce the crops or those who process ingredients into finished products, have stepped forward to financially support messages that counter the half-truths and distorted perspective of Proposition 37 supporters. The California Right to Know campaign claims $25 million has been donated so far to defeat Proposition 37.
The news release has a tone that any company opposed to Proposition 37 is being run by the devil in disguise, and the companies have no concern about the health of the U.S or world’s population.
“The giant pesticide and food companies are afraid of the mothers and grandmothers who want the right to know what’s in our food,” said Stacy Malkan, media director of California Right to Know. “These companies will try to buy the election, but it won’t work.”
Obviously the proponents are wrapping themselves in the flag and indicating labeling is as American as mom’s non-GMO apple pie.
It also apparently frustrates the Proposition 37 proponents that only one of the biggest contributors is California based, and they don’t have a lot of opportunities to stage home office demonstrations against contributing companies.
The group does not seem to recognize the nationwide repercussions of one-state mandatory labeling and the probability that a huge percentage of processed foods would have to use the "may contain GMO" wording because of wide spread production of these crops. It seems more logical for those companies definitely not using GMOs to proclaim such on their labels.
- Scout for aphids in winter wheat
- El Niño development stalled out, but wet winter still predicted
- Ag markets posted divergent closes Wednesday
- Farm bill program to help farmers affected by severe weather
- Israel panel proposes 25-42% tax hike on mining companies
- Ag markets moved almost unanimously higher Wednesday morning
- How much corn can the ethanol industry use?
- Economist: Taxing P could reduce risk of algal blooms
- Commentary: Government wants farmers to quit farming
- Source shows half of GMO research is independent
- Ag markets made a generally mixed showing Thursday night
- What is the relationship between maturity group, yield?