Commentary: Going down the wrong road

decrease font size  Resize text   increase font size       Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

In a news release that wasn’t very new, a major global study released last week by the United Nations and several partner organizations concluded that the world’s population will need 70 percent more food calories by the midpoint of the 21st century to feed the more than 9.6 billion people expected to be alive in 2050.

The target date is not that far away; however, the increase in edible calories most assuredly is.

How to achieve this monumental expansion of food production? Through improvements in the way people produce and consume food, according to the report.

“Over the next several decades, the world faces a grand challenge and opportunity at the intersection of food security, development and the environment,” said Andrew Steer, president of the World Resources Institute, which produced the report in conjunction with UN agencies and the World Bank.

The crisis will be especially severe in certain areas of the world, the WRI report predicted. Given currently projected population growth, for example, sub-Saharan Africa will need to more than triple its crop production by 2050 to provide adequate per-capita nourishment.

“To meet human needs, we must close the 70 percent gap between the food we will need and the food available today,” Steer said. “But we must do so in a way that creates opportunities for the rural poor, limits clearing-cutting of forests and reduces greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture.”

He had me, then he lost me.

The report, titled, “World Resources Report: Creating a Sustainable Food Future,” acknowledged that increasing food crop and livestock productivity on the world’s existing agricultural land is critical to preserving forests and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. But later in the report, the researchers said that it is “unlikely” the food gap could be addressed with yield increases alone.

For example: Although the world harvest of what the UN calls “cereals and coarse grains” — corn, wheat and rice — increased by 8.4 percent in 2013 versus 2012, that is most likely a one-time spike. According to the UN’s Food and Agricultural Organization, over the last decade (from 2002 to 2102) the average annual increase in global grain production has been only slightly more than 2 percent.

That tepid rate of growth won’t get the job done.

On multiple fronts

Thus the report included recommendations that focused not just on yield but also on reducing food loss and waste, improving agricultural practices (whatever that means) and following other “climate-smart” guidelines, which means — wait for it — “reducing excessive demand for animal products.”

You knew that was coming.

“Feeding a growing population requires working on several fronts at the same time,” said Juergen Voegele, World Bank Director for Agriculture and Environmental Services. “Applying the principles of climate-smart agriculture across landscapes — crops, livestock, forests and fisheries — has the potential to sustainably increase food security, enhance resilience and reduce agriculture’s carbon footprint.”

That statement is your basic bureaucratic claptrap, the kind of jargon-ese that sounds impressive but actually says next to nothing. For all the high-minded language, “climate-smart agriculture basically comes down to one item: raise fewer livestock and somehow convince several billion people to cut back on the animal foods they crave.

Only you won’t hear UN officials or any other politicians actually acknowledging that near-impossibility of getting the world to go veggie, nor any practical template for replacing the calories from meat and dairy with plant-based foods.

Here’s Exhibit A: Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations Secretary General, told a global conference on the sustainable agriculture earlier this month that feeding the world will require “a multi-faceted process” involving agroforestry, crop diversification and other practical measures related to meeting the challenge of climate change.

“Agriculture is a major contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, farmers worldwide are increasingly feeling the effects of a warming climate,” Ban said in a message to the Third Global Conference on Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Security and Climate Change in Johannesburg, South Africa.

“The answer to the interconnected problems [of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change] lies in climate-smart agriculture,” Ban said.

At least he’s got the talking point down pat.

Here’s what’s really needed, and it is indeed a three-pronged approach: First, continued emphasis on scientific and technical progress in agriculture, driven by robust funding for both public and private research.

Second, and this is where the UN ought to focus, dissemination of basic farming technology — irrigation systems, fertilizers, modern planting and harvesting equipment — throughout the resource-poor areas of the world. There are huge gains to be made simply by elevating subsistence agriculture to the level of most modern farms.

Finally, biotechnology must be re-focused not just on commercial applications such as herbicide resistance but also on developing improved survivability, higher yields and enhanced nutrition.

Instead of pounding away at livestock producers and pretending that the world’s going vegetarian, the UN and its partners ought to focus on modernizing farming and expanding the potential of genetic engineering.

That’s the only way that 9.6 billion people are going to get enough to eat.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Dan Murphy, a veteran food-industry journalist and commentator.

Prev 1 2 Next All

Buyers Guide

Doyle Equipment Manufacturing Co.
Doyle Equipment Manufacturing prides themselves as being “The King of the Rotary’s” with their Direct Drive Rotary Blend Systems. With numerous setup possibilities and sizes, ranging from a  more...
A.J. Sackett Sons & Company
Sackett Blend Towers feature the H.I.M, High Intensity Mixer, the next generation of blending and coating technology which supports Precision Fertilizer Blending®. Its unique design allows  more...
R&R Manufacturing Inc.
The R&R Minuteman Blend System is the original proven performer. Fast, precise blending with a compact foot print. Significantly lower horsepower requirement. Low inload height with large  more...
Junge Control Inc.
Junge Control Inc. creates state-of-the-art product blending and measuring solutions that allow you to totally maximize operating efficiency with amazing accuracy and repeatability, superior  more...
Yargus Manufacturing
The flagship blending system for the Layco product line is the fully automated Layco DW System™. The advanced technology of the Layco DW (Declining Weight) system results in a blending  more...
Yargus Manufacturing
The LAYCOTE™ Automated Coating System provides a new level of coating accuracy for a stand-alone coating system or for coating (impregnating) in an automated blending system. The unique  more...
John Deere
The DN345 Drawn Dry Spreader can carry more than 12 tons of fertilizer and 17.5 tons of lime. Designed to operate at field speeds up to 20 MPH with full loads and the G4 spreader uniformly  more...
Force Unlimited
The Pro-Force is a multi-purpose spreader with a wider apron and steeper sides. Our Pro-Force has the most aggressive 30” spinner on the market, and is capable of spreading higher rates of  more...
BBI Spreaders
MagnaSpread 2 & MagnaSpread 3 — With BBI’s patented multi-bin technology, these spreaders operate multiple hoppers guided by independent, variable-rate technology. These models are built on  more...

Comments (3) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

December, 18, 2013 at 09:03 AM

Man, pretty snarky take on a balanced piece of researched work. "improved agricultural practices" means helping small-shareholder farmers institute some of the practices of more advanced producers. That may mean fertilizer, hybrids, populations, insect control, or even crop choices. This is actually a big part of the solution. Maximum production from every acre already under cultivation. These guys have to address the issue of animal ag grain consumption vs human consumption but if I may say it--- grain consumption for the energy sector (ethanol) is a bigger offender and is just wrong. I do agree that some radical bone-head will get ahold of this report and trumpet to the world that they now have even more support for a vegan lifestyle. Aren't those folks annoying? Blessings on your day!

Iowa  |  December, 18, 2013 at 09:05 AM

Feeding the world is not a problem, history has shown us the way. Stalin killed millions of people to make sure his political party had enough of everything. Then Hitler did the same thing. They would have succeded except there was a christion nation called the USA that stopped them. Thanks to the demacratic party they have transformed the USA into a socialist country so that we can kill the young and old to reduce the surface population. As you may have noticed the politcal people are the richest and most powerfull, just like Stalin and Hiltler's reign.

December, 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM

Controlling waste begins long before food reaches any warehouse or kitchen counter or mud oven in a thatched hut somewhere. The serious environment-taxing waste occurs when land is poorly utilized for food production (and we do have to eat, contrary to the dreamy myths we are constantly bombarded with). Low yields waste land area and force agriculture to sprawl. Permitting weeds to sap the growth of food crops wastes water (by competing with food crops for soil moisture) and soil nutrients. Permitting insect an fungal pests to dine on the growing food, damaging and disfiguring it is incredibly wasteful. Permitting brutal civil wars to rampage over vast swaths of territory idles a lot of otherwise productive land and prevents harvest of the few food crops that are undertaken - what a tragic, inexcusable waste. And where is the U.N. making any appreciable impact on any of this? Nada, zip! The U.N. is a shameful waste of resources and an increasingly dangerous mouthpiece for purveyors of idiotic liberal urban myths. It is best to ignore the U.N. Failing that, best to do exactly opposite of what they preach (heck, they do!).

Tube Series (TS) Conveyors

USC’s Tube Series Conveyors combine the gentleness of the signature Seed Series with the traditional stability of a tube-style conveyor, ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Feedback Form