ARA overview of hearing on West fertilizer explosion
Senate Environment & Public Works (EPW) Committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) came out swinging last week at the Senate EPW hearing titled: "Oversight of Federal Risk Management and Emergency Planning Programs to Prevent and Address Chemical Threats, Including the Events Leading Up to the Explosions in West, TX and Geismar, LA".
Senators participating in the hearing included Chairwoman Boxer, Ranking Member David Vitter (R-La.), Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), and John Boozman (R-Ark.). The next congressional hearing will take place in August before the House Homeland Security Committee.
- Joint Written Statement from ARA and TFI - Submitted for the hearing record
- ARA Full Report - Includes key issues from participating Senators and links to press clips.
- Fertilizer Code of Practice Initiative
Top issues discussed at the hearing:
1. The West, Texas, plant was covered by a patchwork of regulations with some pretty large holes. Click here to view CSB Preliminary Findings on West Fertilizer Explosion.
2. CSB testified that West Fertilizer used a combustible (wooden) building with no sprinklers. Stored seed (organic material) next to AN with no firewall. Texas does not have fire code. Volunteer firefighters were not made aware of the risk that AN at the facility could explode - 12 firefighters and emergency responders were killed when AN suddenly detonated as they were fighting the initial fire. Other countries like the UK recommend that buildings and bins where AN store be noncombustible.
3. Dr. Sam Mannan, a chemical engineer, testified that if West Fertilizer followed OSHA regulations (29 CFR 109.1910(i)) (storage of AN - based on NFPA Code 490) the explosion likely would have been mitigated or prevented. He also pointed out that there should not be a duplication of regulations.
4. Adding "REACTIVE CHEMICALS" to EPA's Risk Management Program including ammonium nitrate (AN). This recommendation is based upon a 2002 Chemical Safety Board report entitled " Improving Reactive Hazard Management". Click here to view a 2007 CSB video on reactive hazards.
5. EPA needs to update guidance, alerts and regulations for AN. It was pointed out at the hearing that EPA last issued guidance on AN was in December 1997. Click here to view the EPA Guidance Document entitled "Explosion Hazard from Ammonium Nitrate."
6. EPA subpoena of the CSB West Fertilizer records causing a chilling effect for CSB to gather information from witnesses and industry. Information provided to CSB is supposed to remain confidential and not used in criminal or civil enforcement actions by other federal agencies.
7. EPA should use their "General Duty Clause" (GDC) authority to implement Inherently Safer Technology (IST) requirements on industry.
8. Rick Webre, Ascension Parish Office of Homeland Security (Louisiana), stated that "a well-managed LEPC is the most critical function that a community can perform to prevent, mitigate, respond to and recover from an industrial accident" and "I don't believe that more legislation is the answer." He also said that complexity results in failure on scene. "Creating one common operating procedure between the chemical industry, the local 911 center, Emergency Operations Center and the first responders on scene is absolutely critical. Simple, inexpensive, graphically displayed, two page standard operating procedures can accomplish this," stated Webre.
9. Paul Orum, Consultant for Coalition to Prevent Chemical Disasters, promoted IST and adding products like AN to EPA RMP. He also recommends electronic access to EPRCRA Tier 2 reports. Orum indicated support for the "agricultural chemicals security tax credit assists agricultural distributors with conventional security measures such as fences and lights; it should assist facilities that want to move locally to safer locations." Note - The ARA-initiated Agricultural Chemicals Security Tax Credit (included in the 2008 Farm Bill) expired on Dec. 31, 2012. ARA has requested Congress extend this tax credit.
10. Asked CSB about interactions with TFI and ARA. CSB Chairman said they were in discussions with the two groups and CSB thought the Fertilizer Code of Practice Initiative was a good self-policing system with third-party audits to prevent the possibility of future mistakes. Fertilizer COP and other industry initiatives should be used to complement the work done by federal regulators.
11. Fischer asked about the difference between manufacturing and fertilizer blending. CSB said that manufacturing is a chemical process, and West Fert received materials that had already gone through this chemical process. West Fertilizer was a bulk storage and distribution facility. CSB agreed there should be different recommendations for chemical process facilities and storage facilities.
- Japan’s trade talks with U.S. to resume on Monday, gaps remain
- Dramatic warming to trigger surge in corn planting
- Ethanol: Bleak presence, brighter future
- Is there an advantage to more corn acres in your rotation?
- Drought maintains strangle-hold on southern Plains
- Oregon BEST funds semi-autonomous electric vehicle
- 2014 Farm Bill means big changes for agriculture
- Pop up fertilizers: What you need to know
- Ohio bill to require certification to apply fertilizer
- The boy is back? Risk of El Nino this year increases
- Monthly fertilizer prices: Comparing 2014 through 2009
- How to create promotions that attract ideal clients
- Commentary: Blame anti-GMO groups for deaths
- Julie Borlaug says biotech is necessary in fight against hunger
- What does “sustainable” food and agriculture really mean?
- Ohio bill to require certification to apply fertilizer
- Climate change will reduce crop yields sooner than we thought
- Carbon-dioxide hurts nitrogen assimilation by plants