In Perspective: Nutrient standards likely coming soon
click image to zoom“With the entire fertilizer industry working with associations like ARA and TFI, hopefully, strict, unrealistic rules and regulations can be avoided. But it is not a sure thing. Ag retailers and their farmer customers have to buy into the ResponsibleAg initiative.” Two recent court decisions announced in late September indicate more fertilizer and nutrient management regulations likely will be coming for ag retailer across the country.
The first court case involved a District Court judge deciding if the environmental protection Agency had the authority to set and enforce Total Maximum Daily Load for the Chesapeake Bay.
U.S. District Court Judge Sylvia Rambo ruled that EPA did have the authority. The case centered on whether EPA had overstepped its bounds under the federal Clean Water Act, created an unfair process and used fl awed standards.
This lawsuit was brought to court by the American Farm Bureau Federation in 2011 and was supported by numerous agriculture industry associations. Many of these groups issued statements indicating their disappointment in the new ruling.
AFBF’s main complaint with the recent ruling was that “Congress did not authorize EPA to dictate how farmers, builders, homeowners and towns would share the responsibility of achieving clean water,” Bob Stallman, president, AFBF, wrote.
The broader concern for ag retailers is how EPA will move forward with establishing TMDL levels and enforce its rules for the Chesapeake Bay.
In a second lawsuit, the U.S. District Court in Eastern Louisiana ordered the EPA to decide whether to set new limits on the pollution in waterways that lead to algae blooms. The court told the EPA it has six months to make a decision.
This lawsuit was brought by a group of conservation groups, headed by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). NRDC claims EPA has been silent on the issue and needs to take action. In a lawsuit filed a year and a half ago, EPA was asked to establish quantifiable standards and cleanup plans for nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. The recent court decision ruled that EPA had refused to provide a direct answer, which is unlawful.
These two court cases should be taken as wakeup calls for the ag retail industry. Regulations on fertilizer and nutrient management are coming. With the court ruling that EPA has the authority to set and enforce fertilizer limits under the Clean Water Act in the Chesapeake Bay area, it’s not a stretch that EPA will use a similar model to set and enforce nutrient standards in the Midwest. With the court ruling in Louisiana, EPA will be looking at making a decision on whether to set limits for the Mississippi River basin, which would impact all ag retailers and farming operations in the Midwest.
- Scout for aphids in winter wheat
- El Niño development stalled out, but wet winter still predicted
- Ag markets posted divergent closes Wednesday
- Farm bill program to help farmers affected by severe weather
- Israel panel proposes 25-42% tax hike on mining companies
- Ag markets moved almost unanimously higher Wednesday morning
- How much corn can the ethanol industry use?
- Economist: Taxing P could reduce risk of algal blooms
- Commentary: Government wants farmers to quit farming
- What is the relationship between maturity group, yield?
- Commentary: Ambulance-chaser lawyers take on Syngenta
- Berman: Camouflaged activists threaten agriculture