Breaching the ethanol 'blend wall' proving tough!

decrease font size  Resize text   increase font size       Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article


Few will argue the point that rising ethanol production was a key driver of rising corn prices since 2006. But University of Illinois economist Scott Irwin has done work showing, as he puts it, “how conventional wisdom regarding the direction of causality between ethanol and corn prices has been turned on its head recently.” In other words, we’ve reached the point, now that the blend wall has been reached, where it’s more a case of corn prices determining the price of ethanol!

Irwin’s work assumes ethanol supply in the short run cannot exceed U.S. production capacity of about 15 billion gallons, regardless of price. And his work shows the intersection of the supply and demand curves determines the equilibrium price at about $1.70 per gallon recently. The primary shifter of the ethanol supply is the price of corn because corn is 80 percent of the cost associated with ethanol production in the U.S. Thus, the pricing of corn beyond its sole value as an ethanol feedstock is back to hinging on domestic and foreign feed grain markets until/unless a way can be found to breach the 13.8 billion gallon “blend wall,” where essentially every gallon of gasoline used in the U.S. contains 10 percent ethanol.

For a time it was thought that the wall could be breached by increasing use of E85. But that’s going nowhere for two reasons: First, there’s resistance among gasoline retailers to even offer it because of limited demand. Second, even consumers with flex-fuel vehicles who use E85 are disappointed in the loss of fuel economy.

Many refuse to buy it again unless priced at enough discount to E10 to compensate for poorer mileage. So, Irwin and colleague Darrell Good looked at three other alternatives EPA might choose from for dealing with the reality that existing RFS mandates exceed this “blend wall.” They narrowed it down to three routes EPA might do to to adjust the RFS in 2014 and 2015:

1. Status Quo: No change to volume levels in the RFS statute except writing down the cellulosic andate to the low levels actually being produced.

2. Writedown: Reduce the advanced and total RFS volume levels in parallel to the reduction of the cellulosic mandate.

3. Freeze: Keep the advanced, total and renewable RFS volumes frozen at 2013 levels.

Sure enough, in a “leaked” proposal sent to the White House prior to the partial government shutdown, EPA used elements of all three. The leaked documents showed EPA proposing corn ethanol blending at 13.0 billion gallons in 2014. That is down from 13.8 billion for 2013 and well under the 14.4 billion gallon mandate for 2014.

EPA also proposed the biodiesel mandate hold steady in 2014 and 2015 at 1.280 billion gallons, same as in 2013. Further, the advanced fuels requirement would be slashed to 2.21 billion gallons from 2.75 billion in 2013.

Corn and soybean markets reacted negatively because these “leaked” proposals were for deeper cuts than most anticipated. Just days after the “leak,” EPA officials were back-pedaling furiously, insisting the “leaked” proposals indicating significant cuts to ethanol mandates for 2014 were only “draft proposals” and that “decisions about the mandates for next year have not been finalized.” Further, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said that no decisions would be made on 2014 standards until “stakeholders have a chance to comment on any proposals.” And that, sadly, almost guarantees final proposals will be a muddled mixture of politics and economics that will satisfy no one. AG


Buyers Guide

Doyle Equipment Manufacturing Co.
Doyle Equipment Manufacturing prides themselves as being “The King of the Rotary’s” with their Direct Drive Rotary Blend Systems. With numerous setup possibilities and sizes, ranging from a  more...
A.J. Sackett Sons & Company
Sackett Blend Towers feature the H.I.M, High Intensity Mixer, the next generation of blending and coating technology which supports Precision Fertilizer Blending®. Its unique design allows  more...
R&R Manufacturing Inc.
The R&R Minuteman Blend System is the original proven performer. Fast, precise blending with a compact foot print. Significantly lower horsepower requirement. Low inload height with large  more...
Junge Control Inc.
Junge Control Inc. creates state-of-the-art product blending and measuring solutions that allow you to totally maximize operating efficiency with amazing accuracy and repeatability, superior  more...
Yargus Manufacturing
The flagship blending system for the Layco product line is the fully automated Layco DW System™. The advanced technology of the Layco DW (Declining Weight) system results in a blending  more...
Yargus Manufacturing
The LAYCOTE™ Automated Coating System provides a new level of coating accuracy for a stand-alone coating system or for coating (impregnating) in an automated blending system. The unique  more...
John Deere
The DN345 Drawn Dry Spreader can carry more than 12 tons of fertilizer and 17.5 tons of lime. Designed to operate at field speeds up to 20 MPH with full loads and the G4 spreader uniformly  more...
Force Unlimited
The Pro-Force is a multi-purpose spreader with a wider apron and steeper sides. Our Pro-Force has the most aggressive 30” spinner on the market, and is capable of spreading higher rates of  more...
BBI Spreaders
MagnaSpread 2 & MagnaSpread 3 — With BBI’s patented multi-bin technology, these spreaders operate multiple hoppers guided by independent, variable-rate technology. These models are built on  more...

Related Articles

No matching related articles at this time.



Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left


AppliMax Spray Boom Remote Control

Control the spray boom sections from outside the cab to make spray nozzle calibration, inspection and maintenance easier. The 200 ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Feedback Form